Laut NTSB wusste Boeing von Mängeln im UPS-Flugzeug, das in Louisville abgestürzt ist
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/14/us/louisville-crash-report.html?unlocked_article_code=1.ElA.RW_u.VWGAWZbL4F7A
Laut NTSB wusste Boeing von Mängeln im UPS-Flugzeug, das in Louisville abgestürzt ist
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/14/us/louisville-crash-report.html?unlocked_article_code=1.ElA.RW_u.VWGAWZbL4F7A
17 Kommentare
They better watch out, they are about to have to pay a $1,200 fine without admission of guilt
Oh Oh they better donate to Don… the Ballroom
> The N.T.S.B. has said that cracks in the assembly holding the left-side engine in place may have contributed to the November crash, though it has not officially cited a cause. The part had fractured in similar fashion on at least four other occasions, on three different airplanes, according to the report, which cited a service letter that Boeing issued in 2011 regarding the apparent flaw.
So the left engine fell off, causing a fiery crash and explosion, but we’re not sure if the structural cracks in the assembly that connects the left engine to the left wing was the cause…? Do I have that right?
Jesus fucking Christ.
Here is the NTSB accident update: [https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/Documents/DCA26MA024%20Investigative%20Update.pdf](https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/Documents/DCA26MA024%20Investigative%20Update.pdf)
They just got more bailout money and government contracts, Trump loves death.
We know. Boeing is trash
the fact they informed everyone about the issue with the race doesnt exonerate them but it does shift blame. still, they said the fatigue induced separation wouldnt lead to a crash so apparently that was wrong – it mustve resulted in overloading the lugs and causing them to fail as well
Sure they knew about it, they issued a notice to operators indicating the need for repeated checks and offered a redesigned part, but the original part was never officially removed from airworthiness or whatever the terms are. If it was dangerous enough to need a new design, it was probably dangerous enough to remove from service.
Before we start the „BOEING BAD“ comments (which are often well deserved), let’s note a couple things here:
1. The plane wasn’t built by Boeing. It was built by McDonnel Douglas in 1991. Boeing later bought McDonnel Douglas.
2. Boeing acknowledged the structural issue in a memo to all owners of the planes and recommended they inspect it, but that they didn’t believe it would impact any safety on the planes.
3. This report doesn’t conclude that structural flaw caused the engine to separate. It just noted the flaw as a possibility. This isn’t the final report, that will take more time for the NTSB to develop.
4. The plane was 34 years old. Questionable maintenance on the plane is also a likely culprit as to what happened vs a manufacturing flaw on a plane that old.
„You can know alot.
You can know a little.
But whatever you know, just don’t blow the whistle.“
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PaYI53s5aHc
What Boeing employee is going to die because they told this information to the NTSB?
Boeing is in every senator’s pocket
gosh go figure, it’s just like I said when it happened. someone knew and wasn’t allowed to fix it then the inevitable crash happened. it’s not the first time and won’t be the last.
Your package has been delivered to „CRASH SITE“!
Please leave us a review of your product and delivery experience below
Why is anyone surprised by this?
“A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don’t do one.” Fight Club
Shocking… profits over people
Any fines are just the cost of doing business. It’s the same thing for did with the pinto.