Who doesn’t agree with this? All sexualised AI images are unacceptable, I don’t care where they are.
SP1570 on
Anyway JD only uses it for sexualised couch images…
birdinthebush74 on
Vance supports US abortion bans that force abused children to give birth.
Darkone539 on
Looks like the government is doing work for when Ofcom ban X. That’s good at least.
If we are hit with a backlash so be it, but this needs to be handled. Musk is already claiming people are calling for „censorship“ and it’s a free speech issue.
weeklybeatings on
foreign grooming gangs violently raping children on an industrial scale and being covered up by political and police institutions I think is more „unacceptable“ – yet we’re not considering banning them.
latenightbus on
I can’t wait for Musk’s UK acolytes doing the ‚CP is a free speech issue‘ stuff.
OrangeLemonLime8 on
Can someone explain it to me
Is the issue using real people and changing them, like the story of people being undressed
Or is it purely AI? Like, a person created out of thin air that doesn’t exist and is in a sexualised pic?
daiwilly on
Anyone who thinks this nothing more than words is naive!
Criflly on
This is pretty funny. Just stating this is driving a wedge between Musk and the US administration. And that is a good thing.
CaptMelonfish on
Sexualised images of couches however are fine apparently.
YUNoPamping on
We are approaching a time when anybody who wants to generate such images will be able to and the only thing that could potentially stop it is an draconian approach to regulation of the internet (i.e. where banning X and restricting access to VPNs would be the tip of the iceberg – an even more stringent version of what you can see in Cuba and China).
Our current crop of politicians are not capable of wrestling with issues of this magnitude. The best they can do is play „whack-a-mole“ with perceived transgressors.
Gold_Motor_6985 on
I am glad our overlords are sympathetic to our cause I guess?
CrispoClumbo on
Just fucking ban it, the less we’re exposed to America’s propaganda tool, the better. They are not our ally.
Ironrats on
I actually used one of my own holiday images, was wearing jeans and a shirt with my backpack on and it was able to put me into swimsuits (kept my backpack) and I must say it looked good…
Now, if it could do a decent job like that for me, I don’t even wanna know how much more it can do, but I’d be concerned with having such fakes of others on my PC or search incase it came up in future, like no thanks.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
14 Kommentare
Who doesn’t agree with this? All sexualised AI images are unacceptable, I don’t care where they are.
Anyway JD only uses it for sexualised couch images…
Vance supports US abortion bans that force abused children to give birth.
Looks like the government is doing work for when Ofcom ban X. That’s good at least.
If we are hit with a backlash so be it, but this needs to be handled. Musk is already claiming people are calling for „censorship“ and it’s a free speech issue.
foreign grooming gangs violently raping children on an industrial scale and being covered up by political and police institutions I think is more „unacceptable“ – yet we’re not considering banning them.
I can’t wait for Musk’s UK acolytes doing the ‚CP is a free speech issue‘ stuff.
Can someone explain it to me
Is the issue using real people and changing them, like the story of people being undressed
Or is it purely AI? Like, a person created out of thin air that doesn’t exist and is in a sexualised pic?
Anyone who thinks this nothing more than words is naive!
This is pretty funny. Just stating this is driving a wedge between Musk and the US administration. And that is a good thing.
Sexualised images of couches however are fine apparently.
We are approaching a time when anybody who wants to generate such images will be able to and the only thing that could potentially stop it is an draconian approach to regulation of the internet (i.e. where banning X and restricting access to VPNs would be the tip of the iceberg – an even more stringent version of what you can see in Cuba and China).
Our current crop of politicians are not capable of wrestling with issues of this magnitude. The best they can do is play „whack-a-mole“ with perceived transgressors.
I am glad our overlords are sympathetic to our cause I guess?
Just fucking ban it, the less we’re exposed to America’s propaganda tool, the better. They are not our ally.
I actually used one of my own holiday images, was wearing jeans and a shirt with my backpack on and it was able to put me into swimsuits (kept my backpack) and I must say it looked good…
Now, if it could do a decent job like that for me, I don’t even wanna know how much more it can do, but I’d be concerned with having such fakes of others on my PC or search incase it came up in future, like no thanks.