Share.

    29 Kommentare

    1. greekscientist on

      Before the sixties, as Brasília, the capital of Brazil is not appearing.

      But after 1941 as Ecuador de facto recognized Peruvian border (until 1942 de facto, Ecuador claimed Iquitos and a part of the Amazon). Now Ecuador-Peru border dispute has been settled. And it is after the Chaco war where Paraguay won in mid 1930s as present day borders are shown in South America, except for the not yet independent Guianas.

    2. Present-Wonder-7754 on

      Based on the geopolitical boundaries shown on this Arabic-language map of the Americas, this map can be dated to approximately **1903 to 1914**.

      Here is the breakdown of the evidence used to narrow down this timeframe:

      ### 1. The Separation of Panama (After 1903)

      The map clearly shows **Panama** as a separate country from Colombia. Panama declared its independence from Colombia in **November 1903** with the support of the United States. Maps printed before late 1903 would show Panama as a province of Colombia.

      ### 2. The Acre Territory (Post-1903)

      Look at the border between Brazil and Bolivia. The map reflects the outcome of the **Treaty of Petrópolis (1903)**, where Bolivia ceded the Acre region to Brazil. The current shape of Brazil’s „hook“ into the Amazon is present here.

      ### 3. British and Dutch Guiana (Pre-1960s/70s)

      In South America, the colonies are labeled as **British Guiana** (now Guyana, independent 1966) and **Dutch Guiana** (now Suriname, independent 1975). This places the map firmly in the early-to-mid 20th century.

      ### 4. Lack of Canadian Provinces (Before 1905–1912)

      There are significant clues in Northern North America:

      * **Canada:** The map shows the „Northwest Territories“ occupying a massive portion of the west. Saskatchewan and Alberta are not yet distinct provinces (created in **1905**).
      * **The Arctic:** The borders of the northern territories do not yet reflect the expansion of Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec that occurred in **1912**.

      ### 5. Orthography and Style

      The Arabic script used is a traditional **Naskh/Thuluth** style often found in Ottoman-era or early post-Ottoman educational materials (likely printed in Egypt or the Levant). The terminology used for „The United States“ (الولايات المتحدة الاميركية) and the naming of cities like „New York“ (نيويورك) and „Chicago“ (شيكاغو) follows the conventions of the early 1900s.

      **Estimated Date:** **c. 1905**
      The map was likely produced shortly after the independence of Panama but before the full provincial reorganization of Canada was widely updated in international atlases.

      **Would you like me to translate any specific city names or regions from the map for you?**

    3. UnknownEars8675 on

      I asked it out to dinner, so I attempted to date it, but it did not respond, so I think no date will happen.

    4. Environmental-Cold24 on

      Belize isnt independent yet. Same for Suriname. So before 1975. Based on the drawing style I would estimate 1930s.

    5. „H-hey there, y-you doing anything later? I was thinking about getting drinks. Oh–you don’t do that? Yeah, sorry, I should have known…“

      Well I tried, and blew it.

    6. Victim-of-Censorship on

      sometime after Napoleon because Spain lost these colonies idk about these countries though I don’t really bother to learn post colonial states

    7. Since recent hub bub, i never really noticed how maps of the Americas are inconsistent in how they show Greenland. This one obviously has it. Others don’t include it.

    8. The style is similar to the Damascus Atlas of 1957, so it might be made by the same artists or is a reproduction of the original work.

      (i asked ai)

    9. LetRevolutionary271 on

      It’s a 50’s map because there’s no Brasilia and Newfoundland is Canadian

    Leave A Reply