Share.

    7 Kommentare

    1. Compulsory_Freedom on

      The world is edging ever closer to the brink of catastrophe.

      Canada and our friends are going to have to make some hard decisions about doing the right thing vs doing the expedient thing.

      I hope we do the right thing, as painful as that may be.

    2. EmperorBamboozler on

      I feel like the elephant in the room is the Northwest passage being more open than ever. If you own Greenland you can project a shitload of force into a trading lane that will just be more and more important every year. Mineral rights definitely have something to do with it but controlling global trade is more immediately profitable.

      Also fishing rights as going to be more important as cold water species are pushed further North. Climate change is going to make Greenland far more important in the coming years.

    3. Opposite-Cranberry76 on

      That’s the point. Otherwise it doesn’t make sense. Greenland/Denmark were perfectly cooperative when they wanted anything legit, for decades.

      But Trump can’t get america to quit NATO without the approval of congress. The will of the american people, even their republican congress, is overwhelmingly to stay in NATO. So he has to get america kicked out.

      Once out of nato, they’ll need control over Greenland because Denmark will no longer be friendly. So attacking greenland is the move.

    4. It’s nobody, but Trump’s fault if NATO breaks up. So basically it should say USA has become the country that could break up NATO.

    5. Tender_Flake on

      It seems to me that Trump is cashing in on Greenland’s distaste for Denmark and their aspirations of being an independent country. My guess is that this will happen.

    6. MTL_Dude666 on

      Putin and Xi Jinping are now sitting down with their popcorn while the United States is doing what they were only dreaming of doing.

    Leave A Reply