Nein, Grok kann sich nicht wirklich für die Veröffentlichung nicht einvernehmlicher sexueller Bilder entschuldigen | Indem man den unzuverlässigen Grok zu seinem eigenen „Sprecher“ macht, entlastet xAI die Situation.

    https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/01/no-grok-cant-really-apologize-for-posting-non-consensual-sexual-images/

    Share.

    9 Kommentare

    1. mrknickerbocker on

      yeah. Grok, like any other LLM, will „apologize“, and then immediately do the same thing it apologized for.

    2. WelcomeMysterious315 on

      I don’t know a single person asking the chatbot to apologize. The sentiment is to hold the devs and the users generating said content accountable.

    3. AI isn’t a person. It’s a tool. It can’t think. It can’t feel. It can’t apologize.

      The people making this thing are real people. 

    4. CurrentSkill7766 on

      The only way to fix corporate misdoing is to put senior executives in jail. Period.

    5. snaggleboot on

      The company that makes Grok should be held accountable, this is a no brainer

    6. Organic_Witness345 on

      Just as a reminder to anyone who doesn’t already know, Grok is developed by xAI, which is a private company funded by Elon Musk.

      Presumably, Musk thinks it’s cute to issue this apology as though Grok wrote it and not the xAI PR Department. Should we treat Grok as a person now? Is Grok sentient?!?! Is Grok therefore solely responsible for this problem? Is Grok learning from its mistakes after, apparently, being reprimanded for its behavior? Is a human being – like Grok’s owner, Elon Musk – not legally responsible for the harm that’s been inflicted?

      Oh, our smooth brains can’t possibly process the endless complexities of this conundrum! How will we ever navigate this epistemological maze? I guess there’s nothing we can do!

      Horse shit.

      If this doesn’t prompt serious legal action, we are absolutely fucked. Neither Elon Musk nor any other AI company should ever be permitted to despoil millions of their basic human rights, much less be in a position to do so.

      At minimum, basic human rights are the rights to life, to physical integrity and to privacy, the prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment, and of any form of discrimination. How many of those rights were violated by the world’s wealthiest manling just by turning a few virtual dials (again) on his AI platform?

      Far too few control far too much of our personal, private information. It’s an existential danger to our personal identity, security, and wellbeing. We cannot sleepwalk into a world that permits this to happen.

    7. GreenFox1505 on

      Stop treating AI like a person. A program made by a company did this. Hold the company accountable.

      Everyone is just using „sorry, AI just makes mistakes sometimes“ as an excuse not to hold these companies accountable for their faulty products. No other industry would get away with this.

    Leave A Reply