Super interesting! Question…I know York factory but those towns on the eastern side of Hudson’s bay/ St James bay…. Were those actual villages with English residents? Because afaik it’s all Cree/ Inuit there currently
bearlybearbear on
That’s a great map.
Chazut on
terrible map, why is Mexico shown like that?
previousinnovation on
Very cool, although I think a different color for the Russians would be preferable.
Hefty_Anywhere_8537 on
That’s actually great, it’s not realistic when you see maps of gigantic areas of control when it really wohld have only been a few spots.
Themasterofgoats on
Mexico is quite incorrect on this map- by the 1750 Spanish control over Mexico proper had integrated indigenous peoples into the empire in a centralized system, not counting that here is excluding most of the population really
CigsAndAlcohol13 on
English win again

myfault on
This map is not just “approximate”, it is conceptually misleading.
It mixes three very different things under the same visual language: settlement, military presence, and influence, and by doing so it ends up telling a distorted story of colonial control in North America circa 1750.
The problem is the choice of markers. By privileging forts, trading posts, and coastal enclaves, the map implicitly adopts an Anglo-French frontier logic and then applies it wholesale to Spain, where it simply does not work.
Spanish America was not organized around thin military dots projecting influence into empty space. It was organized around cities, towns, parishes, roads, land grants, and indigenous communities fully integrated into imperial administration. Large parts of what this map renders as weak or diffuse “Spanish presence” were, in reality, densely populated, tax-paying, legally incorporated regions with functioning civil government, courts, and economic systems.
Depicting Spain mainly through presidios while ignoring the interior urban network of New Spain fundamentally misrepresents Spanish territorial control. Indigenous populations in Spanish America were not external allies operating at arm’s length, as in much of the French case; they were subjects of the Crown, embedded in the demographic, political, and economic core of the empire. Leaving them out is not a neutral omission, it erases the very mechanism by which Spanish rule functioned.
As a result, the map visually overstates English control, roughly captures French influence, and drastically understates Spanish power. It presents colonization as a coastal or frontier phenomenon everywhere, when in reality only some empires operated that way.
This isn’t just a cartographic simplification. It’s a narrative choice that reshapes history by omission.
cmn3y0 on
Really illustrates why the “California/Florida used to be part of Mexico/Spain” takes are so braindead
brokenB42morrow on
Never realize the French had so much control of the water ways.
BEBBOY on
Was that French colony in TX?
HurinGaldorson on
Cool map.
What is the French settlement south of Hamilton, Ontario?
Dunkirb on
I don’t know, it rubs me the wrong way how the map shows the British colonies as much more stable, when they were the first to get independence. And the West of Mexico looks too empty.
Mart1mat1 on
Excellent map, and thank you for sharing! I’m doing an alternate history of France post 1763, and this map will definitely help.
FartingBob on
Why was the west coast so sparsely occupied by the spanish when it is such a fertile and habitable climate? Was it just lack of trade options or something else? The hudson bay and Alaskan coastline had more colonial control than California?
JaminATL on
Cool to see Kaskaskia on a map since I’ve been able to trace lineage through there. Along the way, I found some great uncles who crossed the great plains and made their way to Santa Fe 70 years before Lewis and Clark headed west from St. Louis.
hbhfl on
those colonies had mostly assimilated back then and thats why there was demand for union like united states, tho britain was against that and wanted there to still be british territory that would later be known as canada
Dry_Okra_4839 on
Never knew that Kaskaskia (now in Illinois) was a major outpost in French America.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
19 Kommentare
Awesome
Super interesting! Question…I know York factory but those towns on the eastern side of Hudson’s bay/ St James bay…. Were those actual villages with English residents? Because afaik it’s all Cree/ Inuit there currently
That’s a great map.
terrible map, why is Mexico shown like that?
Very cool, although I think a different color for the Russians would be preferable.
That’s actually great, it’s not realistic when you see maps of gigantic areas of control when it really wohld have only been a few spots.
Mexico is quite incorrect on this map- by the 1750 Spanish control over Mexico proper had integrated indigenous peoples into the empire in a centralized system, not counting that here is excluding most of the population really
English win again

This map is not just “approximate”, it is conceptually misleading.
It mixes three very different things under the same visual language: settlement, military presence, and influence, and by doing so it ends up telling a distorted story of colonial control in North America circa 1750.
The problem is the choice of markers. By privileging forts, trading posts, and coastal enclaves, the map implicitly adopts an Anglo-French frontier logic and then applies it wholesale to Spain, where it simply does not work.
Spanish America was not organized around thin military dots projecting influence into empty space. It was organized around cities, towns, parishes, roads, land grants, and indigenous communities fully integrated into imperial administration. Large parts of what this map renders as weak or diffuse “Spanish presence” were, in reality, densely populated, tax-paying, legally incorporated regions with functioning civil government, courts, and economic systems.
Depicting Spain mainly through presidios while ignoring the interior urban network of New Spain fundamentally misrepresents Spanish territorial control. Indigenous populations in Spanish America were not external allies operating at arm’s length, as in much of the French case; they were subjects of the Crown, embedded in the demographic, political, and economic core of the empire. Leaving them out is not a neutral omission, it erases the very mechanism by which Spanish rule functioned.
As a result, the map visually overstates English control, roughly captures French influence, and drastically understates Spanish power. It presents colonization as a coastal or frontier phenomenon everywhere, when in reality only some empires operated that way.
This isn’t just a cartographic simplification. It’s a narrative choice that reshapes history by omission.
Really illustrates why the “California/Florida used to be part of Mexico/Spain” takes are so braindead
Never realize the French had so much control of the water ways.
Was that French colony in TX?
Cool map.
What is the French settlement south of Hamilton, Ontario?
I don’t know, it rubs me the wrong way how the map shows the British colonies as much more stable, when they were the first to get independence. And the West of Mexico looks too empty.
Excellent map, and thank you for sharing! I’m doing an alternate history of France post 1763, and this map will definitely help.
Why was the west coast so sparsely occupied by the spanish when it is such a fertile and habitable climate? Was it just lack of trade options or something else? The hudson bay and Alaskan coastline had more colonial control than California?
Cool to see Kaskaskia on a map since I’ve been able to trace lineage through there. Along the way, I found some great uncles who crossed the great plains and made their way to Santa Fe 70 years before Lewis and Clark headed west from St. Louis.
those colonies had mostly assimilated back then and thats why there was demand for union like united states, tho britain was against that and wanted there to still be british territory that would later be known as canada
Never knew that Kaskaskia (now in Illinois) was a major outpost in French America.