Jack Smith sagte dem Ausschuss des Repräsentantenhauses, er habe „über jeden Zweifel erhabene Beweise“ für Fälle gegen Trump
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/31/jack-smith-house-testimony
Jack Smith sagte dem Ausschuss des Repräsentantenhauses, er habe „über jeden Zweifel erhabene Beweise“ für Fälle gegen Trump
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/31/jack-smith-house-testimony
20 Kommentare
F**k Merrick Garland for waiting till the last possible minute to pursue legal action against Donald Trump.
Read the whole transcript.
Of course they’re releasing the transcript and video on New Year’s Eve….
Jack Smith is a hero that’s just doing his job, diligently and impeccably.
Aileen Cannon should be in jail.
That might be fun in the case that Trump is bringing against the BBC.
Aileen Cannon and the partisan SCOTUS are complicit in the crimes.
It must be terrible for Lord Anus if they’re releasing it at the end of the business day New Year’s Eve.
Which is EXACTLY why the senate voted to ignore evidence after he was impeached. The fact that that was allowed is pure bullshit and everyone involved should be in jail along with Trump.
Yes we know, nothing has been done. The United States Government is a corrupt, pay to play slave mill for the common man.
Let’s see it
Trump was committing crimes on live television and half the country pretends he didn’t.
For once, I’m frustrated that Congress hasn’t seemed to leak closed door testimony about something… I’ve seen summaries like this headline for a few weeks but nothing like details …
EDIT:
I see elsewhere a transcript has been released of his testimony that’s better than I expected…
Well let the court of public opinion know that proof we the people will decide
Why TF did we collectively let that orange POS get away with it
If America has any chance. All these treasonous assholes will need to be in prison.
If he had proof beyond a reasonable doubt, then he had a strong case. Why didn’t they bring charges sooner?
No one will be held responsible until the American public decides to hold them accountable.
>Smith authored a report into his prosecutions, and the portion covering the election interference case was released prior to Biden leaving office. However, Cannon has barred the chapter discussing the classified-documents charges from being made public, though Democrats on the judiciary committee have asked her to reverse her decision.
>At the outset of the hearing, an attorney for Smith, Peter Koski, told the committee the former special counsel had received an email from the justice department advising him to avoid talking about his evidence in the case because of Cannon’s ruling.
This goes beyond a simple violation of free speech.
Before anyone says Garland was doing the things the right way and that he couldn’t have gone faster, please be aware that it is already known that this is just not true. Garland prevented the DOJ from looking into Trump sooner, just read the reporting from WaPo:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2023/06/19/fbi-resisted-opening-probe-into-trumps-role-jan-6-more-than-year/
Jack Smith went as fast as he could. But he was appointed way too late. SCOTUS also had its thumb on the scale. But we should dispense with this fiction that Garland was just working the cases methodically. He wasn’t.