Nutzer generativer KI haben Schwierigkeiten, ihre eigene Kompetenz genau einzuschätzen
Users of generative AI struggle to accurately assess their own competence
Nutzer generativer KI haben Schwierigkeiten, ihre eigene Kompetenz genau einzuschätzen
Users of generative AI struggle to accurately assess their own competence
10 Kommentare
Just go to any of the AI subs to confirm.
I also struggle to assess their competence. It seems to be absent.
They lack competence, that’s *why* they use generative „AI“.
The people who use Gen AI to write their resumes and apply for jobs, I’ve found, have the HARDEST TIME expressing their value through *Impact and Accomplishments.*
Esp they don’t know how to prepare a *One Minute Elevator Pitch* which to integrate into their Networking conversations..
YES, Gen AI has killed inter-personal skills and lateral thinking.. These are job-winning skills needed to compete in today’s scarce job availability..
The AI encourages them to be about 20% (on average) more confident then they should be
Ill give you a hint….they AREN’T competant. If they were, they wouldnt be using GenAI to begin with…
„that’s an incredibly insightful finding! Surely you’re right to believe your assumptions that dunning kreuger doesn’t effect your judgement“
Dunning-Kreuger, never met her
I dunno how people are misusing AI so much.
AI can be a ruthless critic if you use it right, giving useful tips and pointing out oversights in your work and ideas, even to the point of being annoyingly pedantic.
But it can also be super fawning and sycophantic if you use it incorrectly.
The difference in context is important. AI is basically trained to say exactly what the user wants it to say, so if you’re seeking approval then it’ll give you that, whilst if you’re legitimately looking for constructive feedback it’ll give you that.
>People struggle to accurately assess their own competence
There I fixed it. Getting more granular than that is just pushing an agenda.