Share.

    38 Kommentare

    1. Does the utopia come with UBI and universal healthcare or will the poors still need to gig it up not to starve?

    2. He is not the only one, and they very much made their plans public a good while ago. It’s only an Utopia if you are rich, else you are little more than a slave. They don’t say that outright, but those are conservative led projects.

      [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_Cities](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_Cities)

    3. “At the core of this vision lies a proposed economic framework Lore calls equitism. In this model, land would be owned collectively by the city rather than privately hoarded. Individuals and businesses could own buildings and enterprises, while land value increases would cycle back into public services such as schools, transit, and social programs. Supporters see equitism as a potential antidote to extreme wealth inequality and runaway real estate speculation that plague many modern cities.”

      I’d like to hear more before I make my usual cynical comment.

    4. “The development team said that the defining values of Telosa were openness, fairness, and inclusivity…”  – so, a WOKE city?? Uh oh, never happening then…

    5. lucabrasi999 on

      There is a reason Appalachia has no major cities within its limits and that reason is there are too many steep mountains and windy, unnavigable rivers.

      The major city closest to Appalachia is Pittsburgh. It was built at the confluence of three major, navigable rivers. It also has hundreds of steep, hilly streets.

      There is little chance of someone overcoming Appalachia’s geography. The cost is far too high.

    6. guitarguy1685 on

      Like the famous Pullman Utopian village in Chicago. It worked so well. 

    7. ok apartment complexes and trees and a walking city, thats nice. The bipyramid is pretty weird – maybe its just art… but the Fing helicopter elevators, wtf is this.

      Billionaires cant get over the fact that normal people have to actually interact with each other and take Public Transportation. They always imagine cities with 3d tunnels, individual pod train, or now helicopter elevators to get places. I cant take this remotely seriously anymore – not that it was ever that serious

    8. Impressive-Weird-908 on

      Hahaha every picture is on a bright sunny summer day. Okay now show February.

    9. BrothelWaffles on

      Ah yes, Appalachia. Where the locals, whose families have been there for centuries at this point, are famously super receptive to outsiders coming in and changing their way of life and redeveloping their land. That should go well.

    10. GadreelsSword on

      Reinvent = Steal land from the poor for profit.

      Those who live in Appalachia are among the most poorest Americans. They’re also vehemently pro-Trump. So, they’re ripe for the picking….

      I remember when the people living around sleepy Atlantic City were promised jobs and prosperity when they “reinvented AC”. They got neither, unless they wanted to be a blackjack dealer.

    11. > At the core of this vision lies a proposed economic framework Lore calls equitism. In this model, land would be owned collectively by the city rather than privately hoarded. Individuals and businesses could own buildings and enterprises, while land value increases would cycle back into public services such as schools, transit, and social programs. Supporters see equitism as a potential antidote to extreme wealth inequality and runaway real estate speculation that plague many modern cities.

      See, this is why it’s important for people to take social science classes and why I always get annoyed when tech bro proclaim them useless. This motherfucker is so stupid he thinks he invented socialism.

    12. AcctAlreadyTaken on

      If those are renders of his „vision“ he should go visit the area at least once. The landscape will never be that flat.

    13. LifeBuilder on

      This is a perfect idea! Since we’ve solved all other socio-economic problems we might as well!!

      /s

    14. aim_for_the_middle on

      Or maybe we leave nature the fuck alone for once. This is utterly unnecessary.

    15. I will apply if there are IQ and medical prerequisites. Another selling point would be if it is heavily guarded gate community.

      No fn riff raff allowed (which i probably am).

    16. 7evenate9ine on

      This is is a tech oligarchy. Sure at first citizenship will be free. But gradually you’ll get paywalled from different life services. Calling the police will need a subscription. Then before you know it using the sidewalks will have a monthly service fee. All of it going to the oligarch. The last time you had rich people establishing an oligarchy the North and South went to war.

    17. If he could just pay his taxes and if people who lived in those areas elected people who weren’t grifters they wouldn’t need this.

      And if they could read this they would be very upset.

    18. splendiferous-finch_ on

      Billionaire should be renamed to the original Robber Baron designation

    19. Does said Billionaire shed the bulk of their wealth in the process? If not, not interested.

    20. grumpythenick on

      “A billionaire wants”… Man, I don’t give a flying fuck what a billionaire wants. It’s bad. It’s always bad.

    21. LiquidDreamtime on

      Targeting a poor population for a company town isn’t an invention or a reinvention. It’s a tale as old as time and this billionaire might get got if he tries to treat these people this way.

    22. Billionaires and utopia are contradictory terms.

      Unless.. they meant utopia for THEM.

    Leave A Reply