Putin ist darauf aus, Großbritannien und Europa zu zerstören. Wenn wir das nicht akzeptieren, sind wir verloren

    https://www.thenewworld.co.uk/luke-mcgee-putin-is-out-to-destroy-the-uk-and-europe-if-we-dont-accept-that-were-doomed/

    Von ByGollie

    Share.

    36 Kommentare

    1. Neutral-frame on

      Probably, but we have to be smart about this. Investments must make sense, not such that will bankrupt us without Russia firing a single bullet.

    2. Oldindian08 on

      History’s on repeat same empire games, just upgraded with nukes and propaganda.

    3. not_just_putin on

      We don’t have to accept, we have to fight that. And it’s not about putin, it’s about russia and russians.

    4. Gentle_Snail on

      If you post something like this in a UK sub it gets swamped with suspicious accounts desperately trying to convince us that Russia isn’t a threat and that Britain isn’t worth defending. 

    5. shovepiggyshove_ on

      They just want a fragmented Europe so anyone could sell us their s**tty products more easily.

      Global economy wouldn’t survive a month without European market.

      At this point, let’s just call it what it is, a proxy trade war between China and US.

    6. HubbyGhorlxz on

      This seems more like a headline framing issue than a literal claim. A lot of UK media still uses “Europe” as shorthand for the EU or continental Europe, even though it’s technically imprecise. It does tend to confuse the discussion, though.

    7. This is not news. They want to conquer or destroy us. Our only chance is to unite and show them it will cost them their country as well. MAD is the only way, my friends!

    8. MyRedundantOpinion on

      Turning Point: The Bomb And The Cold War

      Give that documentary a watch, it’s basically how the Cold War never ended. It’s a good watch.

    9. The destruction of the “west” including Britain, EU, the USA and Canada has been Putin’s playbook for years. It’s all straight from Dugin’s Foundations of Geopolitics.

    10. Puketin needs to get past Ukraine yet. How long has it taken him?
      Meanwhile back at the ranch, Poland & all the others & gearing up.

    11. WhatANoob2025 on

      I mean the headline is probably true, but a paywalled article by some unkown irrelevant news page that wants me to sign up/pay before I’ve even had a chance to assess if they’re to be taken seriously.

      No thanks.

    12. GrannyFlash7373 on

      Putin got a BIG win, when Trump was sworn in, so now one of his biggest headaches has been neutralized, but the EU and NATO still has the POWER to contain him or eliminate him, and he will NOT stop till he has, neutralized them as well.

    13. Putin and the current American administration and Europeans haven’t contended with that fact yet.

    14. midnightseanavy on

      HELP ME (USA) Understand:

      From an American perspective, I’m trying to understand Europe’s response to Russia.

      I know the current situation in the U.S. looks alarming from the outside. It is. But this is not a broad shift in American opinion toward Russia or Vladimir Putin. That sympathy exists within a small far-right authoritarian faction, not the general population. Most Americans still view Russia as a clear adversary and support Ukraine. What you’re seeing is political dysfunction, not a change in core alignment.

      With that context, Europe’s approach is confusing to many of us watching from here. The threat from Russia seems obvious. Allowing Russia more time in Ukraine gives it space to entrench its gains, rebuild its military, and make future conflict more dangerous and costly. From the outside, delay looks less like caution and more like postponing the inevitable.

      So my question for Europeans is straightforward: why is it so difficult to act in a unified and decisive way when the threat appears clear and the long-term costs of delay keep increasing? What internal constraints are preventing Europe from moving faster?

    15. ZippityZipZapZip on

      Which is HYPER AMBITUOUS.

      Europe was and is the main threat for the mobster regime in Russia. Any normalization to the European level of state government would mean the cronies would lose their dictatorial power.

      The failed invasion of Ukraine was a gambit to destablize their bordering countries. Losing Ukraine (and Belarus) would imply the wave of democratization would come knocking on their doors a little too heavily.

      Forget all the schizophrenic rewriting of history and delusional fear mongering about trans-rights and migrants. Fun fact: Russia has way more muslims than France or Germany. It all boils down to a scared regime willing to do whatever to protect their power; sacrifice the economy and throw a million bodies in a meat blender.

      It’s cynical and it is mechanical and it is all they have and are living for.

    16. DaysedAndRefused on

      >destroy

      You misspelled enslave.

      This is Russia, they wouldn’t have anything if they didn’t steal it first.

    17. snakeoildriller on

      Apart from the psychological victory, I can’t see what he’d gain by conquering the UK: we’re not exactly in a healthy state.

    18. Here we go again 🙂 Kremlin started another round of shitty propaganda articles?
      May be it is pukin who is doomed 🙂

    19. AdminEating_Dragon on

      Most people accept it – but part of the ones who accept it don’t want to pay the price of sovereignity.

      They think that „the billionaires/the rich/the politicians should pay“ or they are uneasy with the idea of Russian influence in Europe, but still prefer it over the alternative of paying more for electricity/in taxes so that we can fund a European Defense.

      It’s the same mentality people have about minority rights: a lot of them support them in theory, but it’s not something that decides their vote, so you have people in Italy who are pro-same sex marriage vote for Meloni (for the economy or whatever other reason) – they don’t care enough.

      This individualism, both in voter level and in national leve, is one of the major roadblocks towards a unified, sovereign Europe which doesn’t have to appease Trump and play along with Putin’s threats.

    20. Lazy-Care-9129 on

      The only country he’s destroying is Russia and well, Ukraine. If China would partner up with the EU and UK before Russia, they’d really be doomed.

    21. drumzandice on

      He destroyed the US, he’s maybe the greatest criminal mastermind of all time.

    22. I’m tired of these alarmist headlines. Russia lost at least 500 000 soldiers to seize a quarter of Ukraine, and now we’re supposed to believe they’re about to conquer all of Europe despite the fact that European countries are actively rearming. Even the Baltic states’ armies are much stronger than most people think.

      Russia’s border with Finland is severely depleted. Most of the troops once stationed there have been redeployed to the Ukrainian front. Ironically, this weakens both the West’s narrative that Russia is preparing to invade the rest of Europe and Putin’s own narrative that NATO poses an existential threat to Russia.

    23. EuFacDreptate on

      But even if he manages to grind past Ukraine in what? Maybe ten, fifteen, thirty years? With the same army and generals constantly defecting or switching sides? He might not even make it that far, given how bad the economy looks he could die or be taken out long before. And I honestly can’t wait to see how he plans to “fight” truly powerful countries that already have full visibility into just how disastrous his battlefield strategy really is.

    Leave A Reply