Share.

    1 Kommentar

    1. Glittering_Foot_2461 on

      >“You get the names Kimchi 1, Kimchi 2, 3, 4 and 5. And you’ll be known in history as the Christmas Miracle, five fragile lives tossed on the treacherous, uncaring currents of history, and the sea.“

      I am not sure of the authors intent, but I found the repeated use of the names „Kimchi 1, 2,3…“ was a bit odd and maybe lazy at best, dehumanizing at worst.

      >Kimchis 1 through 5 were monikers bestowed on them by US crew members in homage to the beloved Korean dish (and perhaps a reflection of a less culturally sensitive time).

      Yes this is what the American soldiers referred to them as and including it in the story is an important piece, but *perhaps* a reflection? It is **clearly** “ reflection of a less culturally sensitive time“

      But later in the article they keep repeating the names „Kimchi 1 and Kimchi 5“ which is confusing.

      Imagine if they did a story about black babies where they referred to them as Watermelon 1-5 or middle eastern babies referred to as Camels 1-5?

      I doubt that they would repeatedly use these terms to describe the babies after establishing the context in which these offensive names were given.

    Leave A Reply