Close Menu
    Einige Schwärzungen von Epstein-Dateien werden durch Hacks rückgängig gemacht. Seit Montagabend kursieren nicht redigierte Texte aus veröffentlichten Dokumenten in den sozialen Medien
    Technik

    Einige Schwärzungen von Epstein-Dateien werden durch Hacks rückgängig gemacht. Seit Montagabend kursieren nicht redigierte Texte aus veröffentlichten Dokumenten in den sozialen Medien


    Einige Schwärzungen von Epstein-Dateien werden durch Hacks rückgängig gemacht. Seit Montagabend kursieren nicht redigierte Texte aus veröffentlichten Dokumenten in den sozialen Medien

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/23/epstein-unredacted-files-social-media

    Share.
    View 39 Comments

    39 Kommentare

    3. dont-bend-the-knee on

      The President raped Children and is using our government to cover it up.
      This needs to be repeated over and over until he’s removed.

    4. bswalsh on

      The only bright part in all of this is that the most evil administration in American history is also the most stunningly incompetent.

    7. blackbeltmessiah on

      The “copy/paste” hack.

      Gonna need the power glove for this one.

    8. faulkkev on

      I had wondered if there was a way to remove the marker or pixel fill. Not sure if really possible but I hope so. This clown needs to go to prison. Over time it is becoming clear his evil and past bad deeds are well beyond pedo seasons.

    9. Optimoprimo on

      The „hack“ is that you can copy and paste the text into a Word document.

      This administration would be even more dangerous if they weren’t all so incompetent.

    11. Mountain_rage on

      Should have waited until all files were released damit! Now the incompetent admin will hire 1000 more agents to fix the mistakes. 

    12. timothypjr on

      They’re not hacks—by any definition. There’s an actual tool in Acrobat that will redact correctly and prevent this, but these knuckle draggers were too stupid to realize that. Thanks morons!

    13. checkValidInputs on

      LOL they didn’t cut out the parts of the images to be redacted? I’ve known to do that since I was a child. This is an alarming sign of incompetence.

    14. OnECenTX on

      wait, so did they just „black highlight“ the pages on acrobat/word??? i’m dead.

    15. kmfdm_mdfmk on

      This is how we finally fight back when we’ve been afforded powerlessness otherwise.

    16. DribbleYourTribble on

      „Trump DOJ failed to properly redact victims names from released documents“

      That’s the correct headline.

    19. love2go on

      I’d love to see the perps in the files but hope the victims don’t get exposed too.

    20. timberwolf0122 on

      Breaking news, Trump declares control, a war control C control V as threats to national security

    21. clantz on

      I sort of remembered that there was a way to un-redact text! Glad to see the tech bros doing this noble task!

    22. pippinsfolly on

      Either they don’t know how to flatten documents, or whoever was assigned to redact wants to see criminals face actual justice and purposefully didn’t flatten them before release.

    24. Hot-Philosophy-7671 on

      Adobe Acrobat asks whether you want to finalize marked redactions every time you save. Stupid or intentional in this case? Who can say?

    27. brickout on

      „Hacks“ = copy/paste. God, i hope for a day that our media are worth something.

    30. Pretend-Average1380 on

      So… is there anything new revealed? Everyone just keeps talking about how dumb the coverup is (deserved), but is there now evidence?

    32. son-of-a-brick on

      Yeah, this isn’t a hack as others have said. It’s gross incompetence and negligent idiocy. I bet the persons redacting were using an old and basic version of PDF viewer or PowerPoint or something like that.

    33. CiceroTheAbsurd on

      I find it interesting the narrative for the cause of this short coming is “incompetence” and not “deliberate”. Consider for a moment the individual(s) responsible for redacting these pdfs felt a responsibility to maybe feign doing their job. Just my take.

    35. Skinny0ne on

      Calling a simple computer command ‚HACK‘ is a bit much. Dude just copy and pasted one of the most basic things you can do.

    37. OrangeSlicer on

      Remember what DOGE found earlier this year folks:

      **Outdated tech in many agencies**
      DOGE leaders and lawmakers involved with it pointed out that many government systems are old and inefficient. Some federal offices historically chose to stick with antiquated computers and software rather than keep them up to date, which makes operations slower and less secure. 

      **Legacy systems still widely used**
      Examples include agencies operating systems that are analog rather than fully digital or relying on very old software languages that few people are trained to maintain — the kind of “legacy tech” that can cost more to run and is weaker on security. 

      **IT modernization was explicitly part of DOGE’s mandate**
      The official executive order establishing DOGE tasked it with modernizing federal technology, software, and IT systems to increase efficiency and productivity across agencies. 

      **Broader government IT issues acknowledged outside DOGE**
      Independent government oversight reports (e.g., from the Government Accountability Office) also show that a large share of federal IT spending goes to maintaining legacy systems rather than upgrading them — something DOGE and related lawmakers highlighted as part of the case for reform. 

    38. eternalbuzzard on

      Is this like in Hidden Figures when all Kathryn had to do was hold the redacted paper up to a light and she could see through the sharpie?

    Leave A Reply