Greta Thunberg wurde bei einer Protestkundgebung zur Unterstützung der Hungerstreikenden der Palästina-Aktion festgenommen
https://news.sky.com/story/greta-thunberg-arrested-at-a-protest-supporting-palestine-action-hunger-strikers-13486842
Von Sensitive_Echo5058
12 Kommentare
>“I support the Palestine Action _prisoners_. I oppose genocide.“
It is now illegal to support people who are _accused_ of committing a crime.
The deliberate „bolding“ of certain words and the fading of others is clearly an attempt to both support the proscribed organisation but also give plausible deniability if this is used as a reason for her arrest.
Although ultimately it changes nothing.
I guess the question is.. if you swap Palestine action for *Insert middle eastern terrorist group* is it still illegal?
If yes, no issues imo.
If no, then something is awry.
The actions of Palestine action are undeniably terrorist in nature, and they are a proscribed group so it ticks all those boxes.
The question is how we deal with people that support those groups and if it’s being fairly applied across the board.
(To be clear I don’t think what’s happening here is wrong, and it’s very easy to oppose what’s happening/support Palestine without supporting Palestine action)
amazing how quickly PA posts attract comments, meanwhile support for a terror state is promoted and nobody bats an eyelid https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/300-pack-london-launch-as-uk-israel-alliance-debuts-with-douglas-murray-conversation/
This is where it confirms that she isn’t about climate change but more about attention seeking.
If she remained an Eco-warrior I’d still have a great deal of respect for her.
Now that she’s found a new cause to champion, that seems to have been downgraded.
when was the last time she made some public push to try and convince or even shame someone into climate action?
Edit: anyone care to provide an example of climate action recently? All I’ve seen is virtue signalling and supporting terrorists.
Calling for an end to innocent deaths is a good thing.
Supporting proscribed terrorist organisations is not.
Supporting a terrorist organisation will make it hard to travel to the UN New York to express support for the Intifada?
So she supports violence against whomever civilians she deems deserving. Should have been no surprise when she supported „Palestine“ right after October 7th. She doesn’t oppose genocide, she just wants to genocide another group.
Not a great idea to openly support a proscribed organisation. Not a problem holding to humanitarian standards and calling out Nation State behaviours, not a problem demanding free speech. But politics and deliberately focussing on the illegal is just stupidity and a waste of a valuable voice.
So she’s a terrorist by that logic. This is going to make Starmer look daft on the world stage. Terrible optics.
PA being proscribed is a joke. The PIRA, the other Republican groups, the loyalist paramilitaries are all examples of actual proscribed groups.
PA is nowhere near the same level. This country is a joke lol
I mean the sign at best says I support the sledgehammer attack on the female officer and at worst treason.
I don’t know how any grown adult can defend her actions here. All she had to do was write Palestine instead but she deliberately chose to be a moron.