>A Moroccan terrorist convicted in Quebec almost two decades ago has been denied parole in a decision that said he had no remorse and continued to legitimize violence.
>
>Said Namouh, 52, remains a “significant, indeed concerning, risk,” despite having been behind bars since 2007, according to the Parole Board of Canada.
ArugulaElectronic478 on
Keep him locked up, it’s that easy folks.
Daddy_Immaru on
Perfect time for the Liberals to give him $10 million
[deleted] on
[removed]
Carbonman_ on
Deport him as soon as his sentence is up.
Abject_Rhubarb_3430 on
Sooo
If they are deported they can scheme against the people that locked them up.
Or
They are kept behind bars, paid for by the constituents of the locale and potentially less scheming.
Which is a better choice?
ahockofham on
What a surprise
Once_a_TQ on
No shit.
Once radicalized there is no coming back.
MrAkbarShabazz on
I wonder if Gladue works here?
theangleofdarkness99 on
This isn’t frustrating at all:
„Namouh could also delay his departure from Canada by claiming he faces risks if returned to Morocco, and could be released from custody while the CBSA processes his request
Valahul77 on
This is just another proof that the citizenship should be made revokable.At least for dual citizens.
Outrageous_Order_197 on
Have they tried giving him 10 million dollars? Are they stoopid?
prsnep on
Maybe we need to revisit our assumptions about deradicalization.
15 Kommentare
>A Moroccan terrorist convicted in Quebec almost two decades ago has been denied parole in a decision that said he had no remorse and continued to legitimize violence.
>
>Said Namouh, 52, remains a “significant, indeed concerning, risk,” despite having been behind bars since 2007, according to the Parole Board of Canada.
Keep him locked up, it’s that easy folks.
Perfect time for the Liberals to give him $10 million
[removed]
Deport him as soon as his sentence is up.
Sooo
If they are deported they can scheme against the people that locked them up.
Or
They are kept behind bars, paid for by the constituents of the locale and potentially less scheming.
Which is a better choice?
What a surprise
No shit.
Once radicalized there is no coming back.
I wonder if Gladue works here?
This isn’t frustrating at all:
„Namouh could also delay his departure from Canada by claiming he faces risks if returned to Morocco, and could be released from custody while the CBSA processes his request
This is just another proof that the citizenship should be made revokable.At least for dual citizens.
Have they tried giving him 10 million dollars? Are they stoopid?
Maybe we need to revisit our assumptions about deradicalization.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Said_Namouh](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Said_Namouh)
>*In 2009, he was convicted under the* [*Canadian Anti-Terrorism Act*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Anti-Terrorism_Act) *of distributing „*[*jihadist*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihadist)*“ propaganda online and sentenced to* [*life imprisonment*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_imprisonment)*.*[*^([1])*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Said_Namouh#cite_note-line-1)[*^([4])*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Said_Namouh#cite_note-4)[*^([5])*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Said_Namouh#cite_note-CP-5)
Probably lives in Brampton, gov opened floodgates, probably studied at seneca