Share.

    23 Kommentare

    1. My guess is that Trump decided that anything in the Epstein files that implicated him in any way were classified. They gave trump (who can unilaterally decide what is/isn’t classified) the perfect tool to cover up whatever he wants with no oversight.

    2. XxNimblyBimblyXx on

      Why don’t the survivors just hold a press conference and name every perpetrator and what they did?

    3. HotTakes4Free on

      The victims were failed way back in the 2000s, when Epstein was basically let off with a warning. It’s true the full extent of the conspiracy is still being covered up, and it may also be so byzantine, it’s hard to even discern the truth. But the victims of underage sex trafficking have been free to spill the beans, and they have been doing that. If she’s saying there are perpetrators of sex crimes going unpunished, then she should name them.

    4. My heart breaks for the victims.

      Their government has completely failed them because they are the same group of predators who
      committed the crimes. It must feel like living hell, and I am filled with rage for them.

      At this point, anyone who still manages to wake up in the morning, look themselves in the mirror, and drive around with a trump flag or sticker…yea…you are beyond repair. And I will have no issue whatsoever walking up to anyone (who will also likely have a golden cross around their neck) and ask, “why do you support child rape?”

      There’s no more daylight between supporting Trump and supporting raping children.

    5. Running_From_Zombies on

      >[Financial records](https://www.politico.com/news/2025/12/19/epstein-files-justice-department-missing-00701512), internal memos from prosecutors who investigated Epstein’s alleged sex-trafficking ring, key material obtained from the searches of Epstein’s palatial homes — none of it figured prominently in the documents released Friday.

      >Interested in records that would help explain how Epstein grew so wealthy? None to be found.

      >Want to read emails from federal prosecutors deciding who to charge — and, equally importantly, who not to charge — during their 2019 investigation? You’re out of luck.

      >Curious about the role of Maurene Comey, the prosecutor who co-led the probes into Epstein and his co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, before being fired without explanation in July? Nothing from her to see here.

      >The department was obligated by law to release the entire universe of documents related to Epstein, the late convicted sex offender, and Maxwell, who was convicted of aiding and participating in his sex-trafficking ring, by Friday. The tranche made public represented only a fraction of the total material, which the government has said exceeds 300 gigabytes worth of data and physical evidence.

      >Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, estimated the production included only about 10 percent of the material in the department’s possession.

      >Khanna said the drop didn’t contain the files he was looking for, stating the release “seems at very best incomplete.”

      >**[“There’s a draft indictment of the first Jeffrey Epstein case that really implicates other rich and powerful men who knew about the abuse or participated in it.](https://www.opb.org/article/2025/12/20/newly-released-epstein-files-include-many-already-public-documents/)** That indictment should be released,” Khanna said when Mary Louise Kelly asked what he still needed to see. “There are witness interviews between the FBI and other people who were accused of being at Jeffrey Epstein’s rape island or going to parties where there were 16 and 17-year-old girls being paraded around, those witness memorandums need to be released.”

    6. I have nothing but sympathies for the victims and agree with her but that said this has as much value as Trump or Epstein himself saying they saw the released files and there’s no coverup.  She’s biased and I would prefer to hear from independent third parties. 

    7. A coverup for sure and it’s not to protect the victims. It to protect the predators!

    8. The truth is, they decide that the consequences of the crime are greater than those of the cover-up. We therefore need a whistleblower or a hacker.

    9. This is one of the only people who can make a statement like this without deserving a „no shit, Sherlock“ response.

    10. Opening_Pizza on

      Zionist Miriam Adelson gave Trump $100 million, so he’s not about to expose an Israeli pedophile blackmail operation. If you support Israel, this is what you support.

    11. It’s a civilian related case. Nothing is classified about it. For them to not release shit is indeed a cover up.

    12. And just in case double negatives trip you up here it is reworded:

      There has definitely been a cover-up.

    13. katreddit66 on

      This is teaching all pdf’s they can get away with threats to child victims, “I’m an adult and nobody will believe you.” – If adult victims are not believed, how will a child ever get help?

    14. The victim needs to give names, instead if complaining and protecting her payout.

    15. newsflashjackass on

      Yes indeed, Trump is covering up his guilt.

      It is like everyone forgot the footage of Epstein’s cell during his „suicide“ had a cut segment. To be specific the interesting segment.

      Did you expect a confession signed with an auto-sharpie?

    16. Altruistic_Put745 on

      I want to apologize to you. I could never understand what you went through. I’m sorry that the government corruption is so out of control. I pray that you get justice.

    Leave A Reply