Navigieren durch die Zukunft der Arbeit: Ein Argument für eine Robotersteuer im Zeitalter der KI | Brookings – Die Einführung dieser Steuer erfordert möglicherweise die Ausweitung der Rechtspersönlichkeit auf Roboter, nicht um Robotern Menschenrechte zu gewähren, sondern um eine strukturierte Grundlage für Interaktionen zwischen Robotern, Einzelpersonen und dem Staat zu schaffen.

From the article

>At this pivotal moment, the proposal of a robot tax is introduced not merely as a knee-jerk governmental response to tax new and unknown technologies, but as a deliberate strategy aimed at enhancing the equity and fairness of technological advances. This approach seeks to sustain humanity and needed social services in this newly automated landscape, aiming to ensure the benefits of technological progress are broadly shared, thus facilitating a smoother, less disruptive transition for society and the economy. As the capabilities of AI continue to advance, the time is approaching to define the appropriate relationship between humans and AI/robots—a critical step towards harmonizing our coexistence.

Also from the article

>A robot tax, targeting companies that deploy AI and robotics that are capable of autonomous decision-making, fulfills two pivotal roles. Initially, it provides economic support for individuals affected by automation, bolstering unemployment benefits and ensuring the market’s demand for goods and services remains steady. Additionally, it prompts businesses to weigh the advantages of human labor against the efficiencies of automation, especially in cases where the benefits of either option are closely matched. This strategic decision-making is crucial for maintaining a dynamic market and healthy consumer demand, essential components of economic vitality.