Share.

    12 Kommentare

    1. Independent-Name4478 on

      Trump is guilty as hell and Pam Bondi should be in jail for illegally redacting the names of politicians 

    2. Here’s an analytical response not addressing the ’seriousness of the accusation‘. Legally this is known as hearsay without corroboration from the first party in the story. Even with first party corroboration it can be contested without a first person witness *to the act(s*).

      Because anybody can say anything, true or not, and the US system puts burden of proof on the accuser because the accused is innocent until *proven* guilty.

    3. thegeebeebee on

      Imagine ever believing Trump wasn’t 100% in on this after his being in 1000 Epstein e-mails, and Epstein having Donald’s picture on his fucking nightstand.

      If you still support Trump, please leave the sub, you don’t think at all.

    4. shattersquad710 on

      Soooo, if this doesn’t make us do something about it, what do we think will? Thought exercise, go!:

    5. No_Bid_9237 on

      What document is this? I downloaded everything yesterday and would like to find full context!

    6. You think they „missed“ that? Operation „trump card“ continues as planned.

    Leave A Reply