Here’s an analytical response not addressing the ’seriousness of the accusation‘. Legally this is known as hearsay without corroboration from the first party in the story. Even with first party corroboration it can be contested without a first person witness *to the act(s*).
Because anybody can say anything, true or not, and the US system puts burden of proof on the accuser because the accused is innocent until *proven* guilty.
imprimis2 on
Doesn’t say how old she was at the time. Says she’s in university.
thegeebeebee on
Imagine ever believing Trump wasn’t 100% in on this after his being in 1000 Epstein e-mails, and Epstein having Donald’s picture on his fucking nightstand.
If you still support Trump, please leave the sub, you don’t think at all.
shattersquad710 on
Soooo, if this doesn’t make us do something about it, what do we think will? Thought exercise, go!:
Think-State30 on
Op removed the last part of the URL. Of course it’s not going to appear when you click a faulty link
12 Kommentare
Trump is guilty as hell and Pam Bondi should be in jail for illegally redacting the names of politicians
Take screenshot of this everyone before they remove it.
Trump shows up 605 times. Did you even use the search function?
The file hasn’t been removed and is still available here:
https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1332-16.pdf
This isn’t a new claim either, it was released in 2024 and covered widely:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/01/08/prince-andrew-sex-tapes-epstein-victim-sarah-ransome/
Here’s an analytical response not addressing the ’seriousness of the accusation‘. Legally this is known as hearsay without corroboration from the first party in the story. Even with first party corroboration it can be contested without a first person witness *to the act(s*).
Because anybody can say anything, true or not, and the US system puts burden of proof on the accuser because the accused is innocent until *proven* guilty.
Doesn’t say how old she was at the time. Says she’s in university.
Imagine ever believing Trump wasn’t 100% in on this after his being in 1000 Epstein e-mails, and Epstein having Donald’s picture on his fucking nightstand.
If you still support Trump, please leave the sub, you don’t think at all.
Soooo, if this doesn’t make us do something about it, what do we think will? Thought exercise, go!:
Op removed the last part of the URL. Of course it’s not going to appear when you click a faulty link
https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1332-16.pdf
What document is this? I downloaded everything yesterday and would like to find full context!
You think they „missed“ that? Operation „trump card“ continues as planned.
Dang the link has been removed