Poilievre: „Ich kämpfe nicht um des Kämpfens willen“
Poilievre: „Ich kämpfe nicht um des Kämpfens willen“
5 Kommentare
Right now I would suggest Poilievre is fighting for his survival. His party’s patience will run out at some point if he can’t manage his caucus (which is one of the basic requirements of being a leader of a political party). His style is so abrasive, and his behavior behind closed doors with his MPs is apparently so dire, that some are willing to leave caucus, and even the Tories are admitting more are likely to do so.
„I’m not fighting for the sake of fighting“ says the person who’s been part of the opposition for the last 10 years and has ALWAYS been fighting against the leading government.
Even NOW that the new Prime Minister is actually finding appeal in the conservative ranks, Poilievre is still attacking him.
So if Poilievre is not fighting for the sake of fighting, then why is he always attacking the government? The role of the opposition is to keep the government in check, but not trying to derail it in everything it does. And WHY would you still attack it when at the same time you’re saying that the PM is „stealing your ideas“? That doesn’t make any sense.
Pierre is fighting for Canadians to thrive. Unfortunately, Canadians have no thrive left. He sees the issues, uses facts and common sense to call out false information and corruption in government. This alone should make Canadians go “what’s going on”. But we are at a point where Canadians are used to politicians fleecing their own pockets vs politicians wanting to help the citizens pockets.
In another interview, Pierre is saying a majority built by floor crossers is not legitimate.
Then is a leader of the opposition who loses his safe seat, and is so scared of losing again that he scampers halfway across the country to run in the very safest Conservative seat . . . also not legitimate?
Poilievre was fighting all the time even when he was part of Harpers government. That is all he has. Whether we have a Conservative, Liberal or NDP government we need a leader who can do more than scrap in the commons.