BC sagt, dass ein gewalttätiges Wiederholungstäterprogramm die Polizeieinsätze um 50 Prozent reduziert
https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca/prairies_bc/bc/b-c-says-violent-repeat-offender-scheme-cuts-police-interactions-by-50-per-cent/article_719585fd-2e63-5050-9b79-caba8128865a.html
4 Kommentare
Tl;dr Locking up violent criminals leads to positive outcomes for society. Shocking for a few, obvious to the many.
>Krieger says the drop in violent-offence interactions was even bigger, at 56 per cent, in the same period, representing 480 fewer interactions.
>The province says the legal system has increased its effectiveness dealing with violent repeat offenders, with them spending more time in custody and Crown counsel seeking detention more frequently at 84 per cent versus the previous 67 per cent.
Contrary to the criminology pseudoscience spewed on reddit, it turns out that keeping repeat criminals in jail reduces the adverse effects they have on the rest of society. We now have the BC NDP effectively endorsing the „jail not bail“ approach that us moderates have been begging the federal government to implement for the past several years.
“The program also employs “community integration specialists” who try to connect chronic offenders with services, including help with substance abuse or mental health issues—with each designated repeat violent offender receiving “enhanced case management,” as well as closer monitoring and surveillance, according to the province.”
https://vancouverisland.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/article/police-interactions-with-repeat-violent-offenders-down-50-since-bc-program-launch-officials-say/
This is why obstructing the federal bail and sentencing reform bill (C-14) is not a Canada First move.
Better to propose amendments in good faith.
The bail and sentencing reform bill specifically targets repeat and/or violent offenders.
“Bill C-14, which aims to amend the Criminal Code regarding bail and sentencing, has faced significant obstruction in Parliament, particularly from Conservative MPs who are using procedural tactics to delay its progress.
This obstruction has been criticized by government officials as a self-serving strategy to aid Pierre Poilievre’s leadership review within the Conservative Party.”
Another example of putting party and self above country is refusing to get your security clearance as recommended by security agencies through the FI inquiry because you don’t want to be “muzzled”
[Bail and Sentencing Reform Act: Proposed legislation to make bail laws stricter and toughen sentencing laws](https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/pl/c14/index.html)