Konservative wollen nach der „schrecklichen Enttäuschung“ im Jahr 2025 das Blatt wenden
Conservatives look to turn the page after ‘terrible disappointment’ of 2025
Konservative wollen nach der „schrecklichen Enttäuschung“ im Jahr 2025 das Blatt wenden
Conservatives look to turn the page after ‘terrible disappointment’ of 2025
7 Kommentare
“Turning the page” is not exactly what the CPC looks to be doing.
Seems like their refusal to pivot at every opportunity has been *the* defining characteristic of the party since Trump was elected and Trudeau stepped down.
The new slogan is already in the headline of this article.
To avoid a Rule 3 removal (hopefully), the only way Conservatives can „turn the page“ is if they’re able to pivot in light of new information and circumstances. However, Poilievre is still 10 pages behind in the political playbook, while Carney consistently reads ahead. The interview with Rosie Barton should be seen as the final nail in the coffin where hope of Poilievre changing is concerned. This is who he is, and who he will remain to be. The only thing on the following pages of the Conservatives‘ political playbook is the ouster of their current leader and the subsequent leadership race to replace him, that is if we don’t see a split of the party.
Book burning is more their style , if there is no book there is no need to turn the page. It’s coming soon.
Which in this case would come down to tourching the PP’s leadership.
Check out what happened to John rustard after the leadership review in BC from a similar set of political followers !
„Turn the Page“ would make a great CPC podium slogan because it’s in exactly the right verb the noun format… but that’s not what they’re doing.
Pierre Poilievre is entirely about being completely consistent, almost to the point of obsession. He refuses to pivot from talking points or from his tested methods because he still believes it’s December of 2025 not December of 2026.
My prediction: We’ll see more of the same from Conservatives in 2026 except that more of them will defect to the government and the resulting Liberal majority will cause even more Conservatives to choose other jobs or retirement.
„Turn the Page“ by recycling the same talking points and playing greivance politics even in situations where the electorate can see through it? Okay sure dude, you do you.
The Conservatives seem to continually misread the electoral math. Where that Maple MAGA brand of politics is popular, their votes are incredibly inefficient. It does not matter an iota if you can drum up more support in suburban Red Deer.
Where their votes are efficient, in the GTA suburbs, Carney’s „economy first“ PC governance is extremely appealing.
It leaves me slightly concerned for the future. If the PCs manage to deplatform their Reform wing of the party how does a resurgent PC party adapt?
The Liberal investment focussed budget is proving to be pretty popular, even among PCs, shockingly. Does the CPC campaign on taking all that away and ramping up tax cuts and deregulation? Will that resonate with the moderate votes they need? What about their minority of Blue-Orange seats? How would that play in those areas?
Turning the page would somehow involve getting swing voters and their base to turn out. It’s geography that is the conservatives’ real problem. Taking PP out of the equation, what’s the pitch to voters with a guy like Carney running the liberals? After ten years in office no way his left flank gives any ground beyond an election, whatever their feelings about Carney, and the floor crossings haven’t helped the cause of Canadian conservatism either.
All Pierre had to do was stand behind Trudeau during those broadcasts in the early months of 2025 and he’d look like the next leader in waiting