Why aren’t the editors rejecting these for false citations?
Tehteddypicker on
At some point AI is gonna start learning from itself and just create a cycle of information and sources that its gathering from itself. Thats gonna be an interesting time.
nouskeys on
It’s a liar and provably so. It’s ever so slight and, the less you know the boundaries get wider. If you don’t know math, it will tell you 4+4=9
JoeBoredom on
When the system rewards them for generating slop they generate more slop. There needs to be a negative feedback mechanism that withdraws publishing privileges. Too many failures and they get banned to 4chan.
BenjaminLight on
Using generative LLMs in academia should get you expelled/fired/blacklisted. Zero tolerance.
CosmicEggEarth on
AI is not the problem.
FernandoMM1220 on
it took fake ai generated papers for scientists to finally start caring about replication.
SplendidPunkinButter on
But it _sounds_ like a paper that _would_ exist!
mowotlarx on
Archives are also being inundated with research requests from idiots who got sources (including fake box and folder numbers) from AI chatbots.
It’s happening in every academic profession providing research services.
liog2step on
This world is so dangerous.
appropriate_pangolin on
I used to work in academia, and part of my job was helping edit conference papers to be published as a book. I would look up every work cited in each of the papers, to make sure the titles/authors/publication years etc. that the paper authors gave us were all correct (and in one case, to find page numbers for all the journal articles the paper cited, because the authors hadn’t included any). There were times I really had to work to find what the work cited was supposed to be, and this was before this AI mess. Can’t imagine how much worse it’s going to get.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
11 Kommentare
Why aren’t the editors rejecting these for false citations?
At some point AI is gonna start learning from itself and just create a cycle of information and sources that its gathering from itself. Thats gonna be an interesting time.
It’s a liar and provably so. It’s ever so slight and, the less you know the boundaries get wider. If you don’t know math, it will tell you 4+4=9
When the system rewards them for generating slop they generate more slop. There needs to be a negative feedback mechanism that withdraws publishing privileges. Too many failures and they get banned to 4chan.
Using generative LLMs in academia should get you expelled/fired/blacklisted. Zero tolerance.
AI is not the problem.
it took fake ai generated papers for scientists to finally start caring about replication.
But it _sounds_ like a paper that _would_ exist!
Archives are also being inundated with research requests from idiots who got sources (including fake box and folder numbers) from AI chatbots.
It’s happening in every academic profession providing research services.
This world is so dangerous.
I used to work in academia, and part of my job was helping edit conference papers to be published as a book. I would look up every work cited in each of the papers, to make sure the titles/authors/publication years etc. that the paper authors gave us were all correct (and in one case, to find page numbers for all the journal articles the paper cited, because the authors hadn’t included any). There were times I really had to work to find what the work cited was supposed to be, and this was before this AI mess. Can’t imagine how much worse it’s going to get.