Wussten Sie, dass Albert "Bert" Newton Stubblebine III, Generalmajor der US-Armee, hat öffentlich erklärt, dass der 11. September eine Operation unter falscher Flagge war und dass das, was das Pentagon traf, kein Passagierflugzeug war?
Ich habe Beweise dafür gefunden. Das Sicherheitsvideo besteht aus einem Einzelbild, das zeigt, was das Gebäude getroffen hat.
Was auch immer das Objekt war, das das Pentagon traf, es flog so tief über dem Boden, dass es für einen Amateurpiloten unmöglich wäre, diese Manöver so tief durchzuführen. Wir sprechen von einer Höhe von 200 Fuß oder weniger, ohne bei welcher wahnsinnigen Geschwindigkeit bis zum Boden abzustürzen.
Zumindest wurden diese nicht von heimlichen Terroristen gesteuert.
Noch schwieriger ist jedoch die Tatsache, dass das Objekt in Form und Größe nicht mit einem 757-Passagierflugzeug, sondern mit einer modernen Marschflugkörper korreliert.
Von UsamaBinNoddin
18 Kommentare
I remember when this happened and I saw reports that a truck had driven into the pentagon.
No way it was a plane.
Looking at the footage it looks more like a cruise missile.
How did they fly a plane this close to the ground? it’s practically skimming the grass.
There should be something out there that can be used to speculate where something like that might have come from, merchant marine records for example. My money is on submarine from Israel or India.
It’s a missile.
Can AI enhance it these days? Perhaps the truth is behind the pixels
I always had a bad feeling about those two pylons
It’s a missile. The light posts on the parking lot were all standing. An airplane would hit them with the massive wings very easily on approach
For anyone wondering, the white squiggle in the middle of the right of the frame is the trail of the missle. The frame captures the missle right behind that security gate.
My father worked for Raytheon in the late 80’s into the early 90’s before going into the .com startup world. Before that he worked in AOG (downed/disabled aircraft) with a major aerospace company. One of the projects he was deeply involved in was the development of the BGM-109 cruise missile (aka Tomahawk). Nothing weird at all with the big R, just a normal aerospace worker doing aerospace stuff. I’d do the same with the P-8 later on. He was not one to entertain conspiracy theories at all except for when it came to the pentagon itself. He was convinced the rest was allowed so they could hit the pentagon strategically to cover all the audits and such happening an would not relent that the footage and damage were too similar to the testing of the BGM-109 he’d been present for than that of an aircraft. It’s always stuck with me.
ETA: I’ll elaborate a little more on his theory since my comment seems to have a little interest.
He was convinced that the government had knowledge of an event that was going to take place (there’s some levels of proof to this) and they’d narrowed it down to 9/11 and managed to get some good intel as to the timeframe it’d take place in. So then they just waited for it to start, rolled a submarine up on the coast and sent the missile home while America was watching the towers fall. These missiles have a multitude of ways they can be targeted and deployment is extremely fast. They could have the target pre marked and have the missile out within a short moment of surfacing and be back down before anyone was the wiser.
There’d been enough time to evacuate the general grounds so there’d not be ground level witnesses, and with the accuracy of the tomahawk being within a shockingly small area, they’d be able to send it directly into the area of problem. Then they’d just blame it on the main attacks.
They have a video for everything. I never believed the official story. FBI has video of 2pac being shot in Vegas. I’m sure they have a file on every citizen.
Looks like a traffic cone to me
Looks like a commercial airliner for sure!!
100% a missile and now we are only going to get ai and edited videos to show the truth is fake as well
Most probably a Tomahawk TLAM Block IV. I still have recordings we made on-site that afternoon. The „jet engine“ trotted out for the press the next day, touted as having been removed from the Pentagon’s E & D rings was never used in the Boeing 757-200 (Flight 77).
I’m highly skeptical about the lack of surveillance footage surrounding one of the single most important pieces of infrastructure in America. The only video available is from a gate camera with potato megapixels? Seems pretty improbable.
Are there any clearer pictures?
Just ignore all those inconvenient eyewitness accounts from commuters on the nearby roads who saw a passenger jet.
Where is the red circle when we need it?
The flight path was picked up on radar. A while back, there were professional pilots who attempted the maneuver in a flight sim and said it wasn’t possible.