Wie Sie sehen können, sogar in seiner aktuellen Position (die sich aufgrund der massiven Explosion möglicherweise um einige Meter nach rechts verschoben hat)
Der Treffer am Heck dieses U-Boots der Kilo-Klasse war fast genau richtig!
Sie können argumentieren, dass es besser gewesen wäre, es woanders zu versuchen? Aber es hat sicherlich einige schwere Schäden erlitten.
*bearbeiten*
Es war nicht meine Absicht, einen Intelligenztest durchzuführen.
Die gelben Kreise stammen aus der Originalbearbeitung von Suochomimus (yt-Video) und zeigen die Position der Notluke und den Unterschied in der Fahrhöhe beider U-Boote.
Ich habe das Bild so bearbeitet, dass die Sillouthe des U-Boots unter Wasser versteckt ist, um zu zeigen, dass das tatsächliche Zentrum der Explosion, das durch den Schaden am Peer beobachtet wurde, fast dort liegt, wo sich die Schraube befunden hätte!
Denn in seinem Video und allen Threads hier sagten die Leute immer wieder, dass es weit weg sei und nicht die volle Länge des U-Boots visuell erfassen könne.
https://i.redd.it/rhhutknmjr7g1.jpeg
29 Kommentare
Looks like it has taken on water.
This sub will never run silently ever again, if at all.
Anywhere else would have been worst to hit, since the twin hull and ballast tanks in the front and center would have absorbed a good bit of the shockwave.
The rear end on the other hand has some delicate bits relative to the rest of the submarine, like sealings, rudders, the propeller. All of those don’t like to be bend and under sudden high pressure.
Even though it didn’t sink, the impact on the propeller prevents it from being silent. Well done.
Where’s the rest? „It fell off“
Does this mean 2 submarines taken out now 😂
a hit in the propeller would screw it
Submarines are incredibly fragile.
Built to withstand enormous forces and pressures, they are tested and maintained to the highest standards.
I would suggest there will be damage, how severe, time may tell if there are leaks from the military/civilian repair agencies. But we’ll probably never know and she’ll likely be put in to „routine dry dock maintenance“ for years to save face and cover the truth as „non-drone attack, age related defects“.
What I can say, without dry docking and evaluation, this sub is out of action. Even towing it will require in-water survey, and repairs if necessary, which is costly and time consuming. It will also be vulnerable to further attack if she needs to be moved to a different facility.
Complete destruction isn’t always necessary, taking equipment out of the game is still a success.
Apart from anything, it is sitting much lower in the water than previous, quite possibly on the sea bed. Clearly a hull breach and serious flooding…
Still looks like a miss to me.
Looks a lot like shadow from the docks too. I’m surprised Ukraine didn’t send more, that area is target-rich
Oh well, we deeply sorry that our first usage of experimental weapon missed by 12 meters and only done catastrophic damage instead of full destruction. We can promise we’ll improve in the future.
They just destroyed a newish 3-5 years old corvette near the Kerch bridge as well. Slava Ukraini!
Edit: sorry, this news was from 2 years ago.
It appears to be lower in the water but otherwise I can’t tell any difference
These pictures look exactly the same to me. Not sure where you see severe damage.
This was not a direct hit. Wish it was, but it wasnt. Hopeful posts and comments does not lend any credibility to the community, we need to be objective. The sub looks lower in the water than the other sub because the dock is casting a shadow on it. Look at shadows, look how low the sun is on the horizon, shadows are very long. Dock is casting a shadow and is covering some of the sub. Its probably damaged, maybe the prop is fucked, maybe there is some structural damage/cracking – but it was not a direct hit. Be honest with the facts.
Even if it completely missed it would have affected the pressure hull integrity and made it unsuitable for diving. However I’m pretty sure Russian command don’t really care for this type of thing so will send it to sea if possible anyways. If it hasn’t taken on water already, then it definitely will when it dives.
This is the same photo that has been altered. Look at the positions of, well, literally everything and all the shadows. Only the sub has been darkened.
Top picture looks fake. The lower half with the red oxide/antifouling paint looks transparent and the rear dive plane overlaps the quayside as well.
Lol the explosion that close to the dock would send immense shockwaves through the water.
When depth charges explode, it isn’t the blast that does damage. It’s the shockwave through the water.
Better hitting at the rear where the armour is less and a direct route to the inner pressure hull.
this is called пизда рулю
Gotta hand it to them, an explosion like that should’ve blown out the shaft seal (at a minimum) which should have led to catastrophic flooding in the motor room… so either its a pretty tough som bitch, or the crew was able to inflate the emergency seal and control internal flooding… would love to get more info
The biggest ‘tell’ to me is that the RuZZianZ almost immediately put out counter information. The video was taken (assuming it’s not an old picture or video) and in a way that would clearly NOT show the tail end of the submarine. Nothing to see here!
That tells me the submarine got damaged. How and how much are two entirely different questions.
I heard there’s a unit of north Koreans underneath holding it above water
Submarines can sit lower than others for many reasons. Youre looking at a few inches of draft difference between the two. The aft end of the ship takes very little change for water level to come closer to the hatch.
Source: me, a submariner for 9 years.
I have no doubt internal equipment and pipes were FUCKED on that ship and their rudder is probably inop right now. I highly doubt the hull was breached in any way though. They may have slight leakage through the shaft seals but that is easily handled and hardly a real issue
It was a warning shot across the … stern.
This image does a really poor job actually showing what you want to show.
HI Sutton did a video breakdown of the attack and clearly showed the exact location of the hit and even a cut-away diagram showing what compartments would have been destroyed.
You say they could have hit a better spot, but they really couldn’t have. The only potentially better option would have been the other side of the sub, which contains the torpedo bay, but they couldn’t have known if it was loaded at that time, so the best value attack is the engine compartments, which is exactly what they hit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0B1WQPyi2Aw
Sorry but you are looking at the shadow of the dock.