Schauspieler Joseph Gordon-Levitt fragt sich, warum KI-Unternehmen keine „Gesetze befolgen“ müssen
https://fortune.com/2025/12/15/joseph-gordon-levitt-ai-laws-dystopian/
Schauspieler Joseph Gordon-Levitt fragt sich, warum KI-Unternehmen keine „Gesetze befolgen“ müssen
https://fortune.com/2025/12/15/joseph-gordon-levitt-ai-laws-dystopian/
31 Kommentare
Because they kissed Trump’s ass?
We’re all wondering this.
The whole thing with Disney sending the cease and desist to Google because they say they are using Disney IPs to train their AI, just after setting up a partnership with OpenAI is the most pot and kettle nonsense.
Because they are openly bribing the President. Just handing over millions of dollars, and buying mass media companies and censoring their content to serve his agenda.
Markets are often left to operate with little regulation because politicians either lack the competence or the incentive to properly understand public concerns and act on them. With AI, it feels like we’re waiting until countless APIs are already interconnected before doing anything at which point national security risks may be baked in. That risk is made worse by how few people genuinely understand the code being written and by the concentration of safety decisions in the hands of a small number of powerful actors.
It blows my mind that their entire industry relies on basically plagiarism and stealing other peoples’ work.
Notice how Republicans that support Trump stay out of these comments section because they can’t defend this and hope you won’t notice.
>However, this stance met with pushback from the audience. Stephen Messer of Collective[i] argued Gordon-Levitt’s arguments were falling apart quickly in a “room full of AI people.” Privacy previously decimated the U.S. facial recognition industry, he said as an example, allowing China to take a dominant lead within just six months. Gordon-Levitt acknowledged the complexity, admitting “anti-regulation arguments often cherry-pick” bad laws to argue against all laws. He maintained that while the U.S. shouldn’t cede ground, “we have to find a good middle ground” rather than having no rules at all.
Won’t someone think of the invasive facial recognition developers!?!
„Wow, the kicking you in the balls industry really suffered when they stopped us from kicking you in the balls. Don’t you feel bad for us?“
Laws only apply to poor people, duh
I’d wonder if he or his wife could enter politics. I’d likely get behind them. But that could just be their public persona.
Because that’s the way the laws have always worked. For some reason we need a new law every time you add „on the internet“ to something. Same thing happens but kind of in reverse with patents. Take an existing idea, and slap „on the internet“ to the end of it, and all of a sudden it’s a novel invention worthy of a patent.
Other things are like this too. Exploiting workers and paying them less than minimum wage is illegal. Unless you „create an app“ like Uber, Door Dash, Etc. to turn your employees into „independent contractors“. They also made it somehow legal to run an unsanctioned taxi service because they did it with an app rather than the traditional way.
AI companies are getting away with it, because the laws make it difficult to apply the current laws to something that’s new and never seen before.
cause they paid off Trump and the Republicans
Because they have more money than God and no moral compass
It’s partially due to lobbying but also because no country wants to be the first to implement heavy AI regulation and risk falling behind in the Ai race.
Non of the internet companies did it took decades and big tech fought them
Planet earth is a resort for about 1000 people & the rest of us are the staff.
There’s so many science fiction movies and shows that show us how badly this can go wrong. And we’re still pushing ahead at a stupid fast rate with it.
We’re doomed.
And at the same time the US sends people to jail for copyright stuff while Big tech literally stole petabytes of others people work to train their models. Is mostly due to politicians holding stocks in this companies.
It’s okay, the GOP doesn’t either.
AI companies are responsible for the biggest theft of intellectual property in history.
The only way it makes sense is if AI is a front to stockpile chips before we lose access to Taiwan and have investors/the public pay for it.
Probably the same reason the president doesn’t have to. Corruption and greed
Well cause they’re not immigrants.
Obviously because the Law doesn’t matter when you have Money. And the entire economy has been put on top of AI at this point.
Joseph Gordon-Levitt hasn’t been paying attention, has he.
„ooh we have to accepy its happening“ is the dumbest fucking excuse for this shit too.
why do we? what mandates we have to accept that people making a product that fucking no one wants is inevitable?
why do I have to accept that people have too little self respect to care about rh art they consume? why on earth would I not fight for something important because a group of socially incapable rich dudes demand I pay heed to their desires? literally what do they know that makes them important in the role of art in society.
The Corruption is the Collapse. Say it to someone you know irl today: THE CORRUPTION IS THE COLLAPSE
they are breaking so may rules so quickly in new ways its almost impossible to keep up. I think we are based on the concept of people obeying the laws or being punished after the fact after a case has been built and a judgement found.
Have you met the current administration?
Me too Joseph, me too.
Because Trump doesn’t have to.
Why? Because the AI Companies are backed by/run buy the handful of richest people in this world and those people do not want to follow the law because they won’t be able to make as much money if they do.
They have dumped tons of money into governments around the world to remove themselves from accountability to the people.