Kreml bestreitet, dass neue ukrainische Drohne gerade am Pier festgemachtes russisches Raketen-U-Boot in die Luft gesprengt hat. Eine neue Kreml-Erzählung, dass ein ukrainischer Unterwasser-Kamikaze-Boot-Angriff auf ein in einem Marinehafen festgemachtes russisches Raketen-U-Boot keinen Schaden angerichtet habe, ist, wie Beweise zeigen, nicht stichhaltig.

    https://www.kyivpost.com/post/66351

    Share.

    13 Kommentare

    1. Great_Guidance_8448 on

      No, no, no, comrade! It’s the submarine that crashed into the Ukrainian kamikaze drone!

    2. FaderJockey2600 on

      The Kremlin narrative doesn’t hold much water, but the sub now does…

    3. Jonothethird on

      The ‚Russkiy mir‘ where the truth is invariably the opposite of the truth! Russia lies about EVERYTHING. No drone has ever hit a Russian target, just that damned drone debris falling out of the sky! Russia even denied the Chernobyl disaster for days, until a radioactive cloud was covering Europe and even Russia could not deny it any longer…

    4. Like-Reddit on

      We successfully blocked a Ukrainian drone’s path with a submarine. The pier was not damaged during the interception maneuver.

    5. Direct-Bag-6791 on

      Not a single warship or submarine of the Black Sea Fleet (BSF) based in Novorossiysk Bay suffered damage, and (all) are conducting normal operations.”

      I dont doubt the second part of this statement. Afterall, sitting in pier slowly rusting away has been part of normal operations in the russian navy for decades. Just like catching fire in drydock

    6. Schnittertm on

      „Submarine was made with new material, Putinium. Is totally impervious to any Ukrainian explosives!“ – Russian spokesperson, probably.

    7. Internal_Peace_7986 on

      Yeah but that sub is holding an awful lot of water where it sank in that port!

    8. They’re publicly lying to themselves. All these years and they still dont care or see that the world doesn’t believe or trust them. Enjoy your new coral reef.

    9. asdfasdfasfdsasad on

      The size of that explosion would tend to suggest that the sub now has a big hole in it.

      Depending on the number of watertight compartments in the sub it might not have sunk, but it’s certainly fucked. You could weld a metal plate over the hole so that it floats and submerges, but the chances of it surfacing again from a dive of any depth appear to be quite low.

    10. Without a doubt it’s damaged though the original claim that it was destroyed remains to be seen. The fact there is satellite photos of it and they haven’t released them leads me to believe it’s still floating.

    Leave A Reply