Poilievre sagt, dass der Fokus der Konservativen auf Erschwinglichkeit die Partei eint, während die Tories den jüngsten Abfall bewältigen
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-affordability-floor-crossing-9.7015466
Poilievre sagt, dass der Fokus der Konservativen auf Erschwinglichkeit die Partei eint, während die Tories den jüngsten Abfall bewältigen
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-affordability-floor-crossing-9.7015466
9 Kommentare
Poilievre says a lot of things but due to their tactics and theatrics, it is harder to pass legislation to tangibly help Canadians because all they do is obstruct.
The session in spring which didn’t have Pierre in the house of Commons was one of the most productive in a while. So it leaves us to wonder what his true intensions are.
Perhaps losing focus on that, and providing a better alternative focused on that, is part of why certain members left.
Governments don’t see prices. When he says affordability he’s talking about affordability for billionaire companies who want tax breaks. In the fantasy that this will get their prices down. It won’t.
The Conservatives care about affordability in Canada?
That’s the stupidest thing I have ever heard.
They are against Chinese EVs which would allow Canadians to have more affordable choices instead of the relatively expensive American EVs (and some of them from a company linked to a billionaire that doesn’t care in destroying Canada).
They are proponents of a private healthcare system where you get efficiency IF you can pay for it.
They are proponent of oil from bituminous sands, the most inefficient way to produce oil.
Maybe someone should tell Poilievre that he is full of it.
I encourage everyone to watch the Poilievre interview with Rosemary Barton from this morning. It’s an absolute train wreck for Poilievre. Nothing but deflection, and everything is the Liberals‘ fault. Two floor crossings and a resignation, and Poilievre unequivocally states that it’s all because of Carney being sneaky Mark Carney and engaging in backroom, undemocratic deals. When asked what he would do differently with Trump, Poilievre talks about diversifying trade and then going back to Trump to negotiate from a position of strength. There’s zero recognition on his part of the fact that Carney is also trying to diversify trade, and that it’s not a step that can be done overnight. Poilievre even tries to suggest that Obama was hammering Liberals on trade when Trudeau first gained power, and that Obama’s engagement with the Liberals is similar to what Trump is doing now. How utterly disconnected from reality can you be? (And I don’t just mean Poilievre, I mean anyone who listens to him and thinks that he will be anything but a disaster as PM.)
“Things are unaffordable, supporting the party that enables businesses to take advantage of individuals more than any other party” is certainly an idea…
Tried watching that cbc interview…got halfway through and shut it off. Guy just doesn’t fucking get it. Answers nothing, obstructs everything, zero introspection. I like to think I’m pretty middle.
Hard pass. But run him again vs Carney and see what happens.
The CPC are laser focused on affordability.
That’s why they have so many Loblaws lobbyists in the party.
Even Loblaws is lobbying for cheaper food prices but the evil Liberals force them to have high prices
I’d take the Conservatives more seriously if they weren’t the opposite of what they advertise.
It is impossible to discuss the CPC on this sub. Everyone just takes any topic mentioning the CPC as an excuse to make some cheap shots. It’s getting boring.
Here’s the facts. In the most recent Abacus poll, the CPC are leading by 15 points among people who put cost of living as their top priority. The LPC do very well among wealthier or older people who care about stability, but the CPC and Poilievre do very well with people struggling financially. Poilievre is 100% right to say that affordability unites the party and that’s why the CPC remain competitive with Carney.