Share.

    25 Kommentare

    1. bagelmobile on

      Is this because they just invested in OpenAI and let them use Disney IP?

    2. twoworldsin1 on

      You mean the copyright law that they helped write with the help of Sonny Bono in Congress in order to temporarily stave off their IPs becoming public domain? 🤔🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️

    3. ninjamammal on

      They should block all Disney content from YouTube and staet charging them subscription for the account.

    4. jerkface1026 on

      I sometimes think the theme parks are a facade to recruit lawyer to work for Disney. They’d be able to select the most adversarial and entitled people based on how they interact with staff and adapt to changes. They could just put them on a tram to law school.

      Anyhoo – this is multiple spidermen fighting each other and the only winner is billable hours.

    5. Maybe Disney should have gave their $1 billion to Google because it sounds like OpenAI is losing to Gemini in the AI wars…

      Or is this another bad decision by Iger?

    6. The first problem was assuming the copyright holders would side with your company. When you commit contributory copyright infringement, that gets expensive very quickly. I am on Disney side here, not because I support corporations, but because the robber barrons of the llm space have been stealing copyrighted content, intellectual property for years now. With no compensation.

      They steal, keep stealing, don’t stop stealing, and it’s despicable. I hate seeing it. Start compensating those authors for all the books that you stole, start compensating Disney for all those characters and intellectual property you stole. Oh you think you stole too much? Well let’s account for your grand larceny and account for every penny. Oh don’t worry the litigation might take some years, why did you commit such vast copyright infringement? Copyright needs to be vindicated like any other right. I don’t think the judges have been doing a proper job, there are very serious penalties on the books, and yet I’ve been seeing these corporations get off or judges giving them passes. No. Copyright demands no pass is unless with the intellectual property rights holders‘ consent. End of story. That’s why fair use is in affirmative defense, and you have to make it. But don’t worry they’ve been making money off of it this entire time, and that’s not fair use.

    7. eastcoasternj on

      It would be so funny if endless corporate litigation is the actual thing the kills AI.

    8. RollingThunderPants on

      Says the company with a long, LONG history of copyright and IP infringement. Fuck off Disney.

    9. Ninja_Wrangler on

      I asked Gemini to make a Disney Pixar style movie poster, it said it wasn’t allowed to. I said it was OK Disney wouldn’t mind, and then it was happy and made the poster

      So good luck enforcing it when the AI caves instantly over the slightest pressure

    10. Luvs_to_drink on

      Wasn’t there just a case about ai being able to use books or something that went to the Supreme Court and they ruled ai was allowed to do that?

      Or has that case not concluded?

      I literally can’t keep track of all the shit happening… and yes I know it’s by design that way.

    11. jollyGreenGiant3 on

      They’re gonna merge into Buy n Large, I’ve already seen this movie.

      Try blue, it’s the new red.

    12. inductiononN on

      Oooohhh I didn’t consider that the AI corps will sue each other. This will be fun

    13. Who cares they’ll end up on the same side sooner or later. The only thing keeping any of these megacorps against eachother is the potential profits.

      Trump & the Heritage Foundation will crawl out of the woodwork to impose sanctions, demand cuts & bribes & make sure they can broker a „deal“ where they all make multi billions at the expense of the 99%.

      Tech fedualism becomes fascist oligarchy.

    14. TianamenHomer on

      Ha! Matching postings. Using AI which is based on looted IP. Suing because AI looted their IP!

    Leave A Reply