Share.

    37 Kommentare

    1. Fit-Produce420 on

      Great! Maybe they will fail before they glaze their users into total delusion. 

    2. w1n5t0nM1k3y on

      >For many, GPT-5 felt like a downgrade compared to the older, simpler GPT-4o.

      Even just playing around with basic models that I can run on my home PC, I’m not convinced that there’s really any significant difference between something like ChatGPT and something more basic.

      They all seem to spit out mistakes more often than they should, and if anything the ones I run locally seem to sometimes be better, maybe because they aren’t trying to optimize how long they spend thinking of what to say. With a commercial solution like ChatGPT, they will always want to limit how much resources it puts towards any prompt in order to reduce computing costs.

    3. Cancelled my ChatGPT subscription after being an early adopter since its launch. ChatGPT’s answer quality has declined significantly over the past months, up to a point where it straight up lies and keeps on lying and hallucinating even after pointing out the lie and providing proof of the opposite.

    4. Don’t mind me I’m just placing an industrial fan here right next to the house of cards.

      I would’ve bought RAM, but sadly Scam Altman bought it all. So a fan it is.

    5. Antique_Historian_74 on

      Sylvester Mcmonkey Mcbean realising the Sneetches aren’t buying and the people who funded his machines for putting stars onto bellies and taking stars off of bellies will be coming round for their cut shortly.

    6. MarkoMarjamaa on

      Somehow they fail to mention RAM prices are high because OpenAI bought 40% of all, and with cheaper prices. Everyone else is paying more.

    7. i don’t think Altman cares too much, dude already made out like a bandit. Established companies will progress AI more than this vc grifter.

    8. TeslasAndComicbooks on

      They lack vertical integration. Google, Microsoft and even Twitter have a better way of making their platforms consumer friendly.

      Even with all the investments openAI is getting, they are years away from even breaking even.

    9. dream_metrics on

      >It’s safe to say [GPT-5 ](https://www.engadget.com/ai/gpt-5-is-here-and-its-free-for-everyone-170001066.html)hasn’t lived up to anyone’s expectations, including OpenAI’s own. The company touted the system as smarter, faster and better than all of its previous models, but after users got their hands on it, they complained of a chatbot that [made surprisingly dumb mistakes](https://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2025/08/07/blueberry-hill/) and didn’t have much of a personality. For many, GPT-5 felt like a [downgrade compared](https://www.wired.com/story/openai-gpt-5-backlash-sam-altman/) to the older, simpler GPT-4o. That’s a position no AI company wants to be in, let alone one that has taken on as much investment as OpenAI.

      The whole GPT-5 thing was complaints by a minority of users because it didn’t want to fuck them as much. Extrapolating that to „everyone hates the new model“ is silly. For my usage within GitHub Copilot, GPT-5 and 5.1 are massive improvements over 4o, and I don’t use 4o for anything anymore. Even GPT-5 mini is better than 4o.

    10. So

      Free advice, Sam.

      Sell your ram on ebay. Surely you bought it all up on contract before the prices tripled. 

      Bam

    11. coconutpiecrust on

      Um. Yay? Does it mean that we don’t have to “integrate AI into our workflow” anymore? As someone who uses it for some things, I can’t stand the hype anymore. 

    12. that was always the goal, collapse so the collected data can be repurposed/sold/used especially for profit

    13. Headline next year 12/10/26 – “OpenAI looks to be on shaky ground! Will the bubble burst?!”

      Call me when it actually does burst.

    14. I mean, a CEO shows up saying the government should put its support into keeping his company afloat, I’m thinking the primer’s been set and the fuse is fuck’n lit.

    15. asfsdgwe35r3asfdas23 on

      If you owe 50$ you have a problem. If you owe 96 billion dollars, now the US government, the banks, all the partners and even the other tech companies have a problem. They will get a 100 billion dollar defence contract from the government if necessary, the entire US economy depends on OpenAI not falling apart.

    16. BaronVonBearenstein on

      If Tesla can maintain a sky high stock price based on vaporware then I don’t see why OpenAI can’t keep their house of cards upright.

    17. Socrathustra on

      AI serves a secondary, complementary role to other workflows, of which OpenAI has none. Their only product is AI. They’re going to fail and get bought for pennies by some more established tech company.

    18. Please someone, can we get a joke about OpenAI pulling a Kevin Spacey on their house of cards?

    19. AbyssWankerArtorias on

      Maybe if instead of trying to do an infinite money glitch of shuffling around money and trying to make a problem for your product to solve, you actually focused on attainable, sustainable growth and implementing AI for more things like medical science, general research, analyzing economic systems and patterns, rather than making stupid images – this wouldn’t happen

    20. thisismycoolname1 on

      I swear this sub is just a random „AI bad“ article over and over

    21. I asked chatgpt what Star Wars books to read after revan, deceived, fatal alliance. It recommended I reread them. I told it to suggest books I haven’t read, and it kept telling me to just reread them.

      Sick ass answers chatgpt.

    22. Traditional-Hat-952 on

      Anyone else excited for the Trump administration to bail this guy out? /s Because it’s going to happen.

    23. redvelvetcake42 on

      OpenAI AND Nvidia are both cons in this. When, not if, they go tits up it won’t destroy everything itself, but it will fundamentally break the market and force a recession. LLMs aren’t going to save businesses from paying wages on everything. It was always spoiled goods being sold as fermented.

    Leave A Reply