Dr. John Campbell überprüft eine Studie, in der er aufdeckt, dass 86 % der PCR-Tests falsch positiv waren.
Der Erfinder der PCR-Tests, Kary Mullis, machte deutlich, dass diese Tests nicht zum Nachweis von Viren verwendet werden sollten. Er forderte Fauci zu einer Debatte heraus, nannte ihn immer wieder einen Betrüger und starb schließlich drei Monate vor der Plandemie. Ich frage mich, wie viele Millionen diese Zahlen sehen und sie hartnäckig als falsch abtun oder als Bedrohung für die Heiligkeit unserer Demokratie bezeichnen werden.
Von Former_Rush1821
6 Kommentare
Am I missing something? This says 2.3%, not 86%.
What?
They needed to get people to test positive for the COVID virus which is why they used PCR and other spurious methods. The COVID virus was never isolated (i.e., purified). It never existed. They replaced COVID deaths with „flu“ deaths and the eldery were killed with end of life drugs that were advertised as drugs that fight COVID. It was all a scam from top to bottom.
I commented here but by comment isn’t appearing. Will this one appear?
Is this what passes for a theory these days?
I think it’s best to include the links and the article’s conclusion.
[https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/epidemiology/articles/10.3389/fepid.2025.1592629/full](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/epidemiology/articles/10.3389/fepid.2025.1592629/full)
*The principal finding from our analysis of ALM data on both nucleic acid amplification (PCR from mucosal swabs) and IgG antibody (serological) testing for SARS-CoV-2 in Germany between mid-March 2020 and summer 2021 is this: only 14%—and possibly even fewer, down to 10%—of individuals identified as SARS-CoV-2-positive via PCR testing were actually infected, as evidenced by detectable IgG antibodies.*
*Our conclusion is twofold. First, the IgG testing conducted by ALM laboratories was commissioned by the RKI, itself subordinate to the BMG. Nonetheless, data acquisition evidently ceased after cw21(2021) or, at the very least, public reporting of the data on the ALM website (*[*23*](https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/epidemiology/articles/10.3389/fepid.2025.1592629/full#B23)*) stopped. The IgG results observed and published by ALM have not been acknowledged or communicated by the RKI to date, despite the fact that transparency in reporting such data should be mandatory, both scientifically and in terms of public accountability. Second, the proportion of the German population with a detectable immune response to SARS-CoV-2 was already substantial by the end of 2020. Approximately one-quarter of the population carried IgG antibodies at that point, following a trajectory determined almost exclusively by natural infections. By the end of 2021, practically the whole German population could be considered IgG positive.*
Basically a pitiful of 10%-14% accuracy from the PCR testing. Random stuff to fabricate infection numbers.