For what reason? There is no reason why anyone who can do their jobs from home shouldn’t be able to. The benefits are too great to ignore. Both public and private employees. But that corporate real estate market…..
33rdDivision on
My understanding is, Carney’s pushing for bureaucrats to return to work at the same time that he’s shrinking office spaces by reducing the government’s real estate footprint.
I’m a bit befuddled as to where he expects these bureaucrats to sit for five days a week, while they take Teams calls that could have been taken at home. In the washrooms, perhaps? The stairways?
It would certainly be amusing to imagine a Parliamentary committee taking evidence from a senior bureaucrat dialling in from a broom closet.
CaptainSnazzypants on
This is pretty dumb. There’s no reason to go back to work. Boomer mentality for sure thinking you need to be in office to be productive when it’s actually the opposite.
I’m way more productive at home than in office. I can focus and do a full day of in office work in about 2 hours at home without all the disruptions of people swinging by, having to walk for 5 mins to different meeting rooms and then waiting for people to vacate the meeting rooms before we can go in. The benefit of being in office is solely to socialize and may also be useful if you’re white boarding ideas. Those happen once in a while and can be scheduled. There’s no need for full RTO. I wonder what frequency most will be expected to come in. The article says it’ll be different by role basically.
BeaverBoyBaxter on
It’s absolutely insane that Carney is looking at Doug Ford’s attempt to force provincial employees back to office and thinking „yeah, I want that“.
Especially considering a not insignificant amount of federal employees live in his riding.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
4 Kommentare
For what reason? There is no reason why anyone who can do their jobs from home shouldn’t be able to. The benefits are too great to ignore. Both public and private employees. But that corporate real estate market…..
My understanding is, Carney’s pushing for bureaucrats to return to work at the same time that he’s shrinking office spaces by reducing the government’s real estate footprint.
I’m a bit befuddled as to where he expects these bureaucrats to sit for five days a week, while they take Teams calls that could have been taken at home. In the washrooms, perhaps? The stairways?
It would certainly be amusing to imagine a Parliamentary committee taking evidence from a senior bureaucrat dialling in from a broom closet.
This is pretty dumb. There’s no reason to go back to work. Boomer mentality for sure thinking you need to be in office to be productive when it’s actually the opposite.
I’m way more productive at home than in office. I can focus and do a full day of in office work in about 2 hours at home without all the disruptions of people swinging by, having to walk for 5 mins to different meeting rooms and then waiting for people to vacate the meeting rooms before we can go in. The benefit of being in office is solely to socialize and may also be useful if you’re white boarding ideas. Those happen once in a while and can be scheduled. There’s no need for full RTO. I wonder what frequency most will be expected to come in. The article says it’ll be different by role basically.
It’s absolutely insane that Carney is looking at Doug Ford’s attempt to force provincial employees back to office and thinking „yeah, I want that“.
Especially considering a not insignificant amount of federal employees live in his riding.