Während KI Arbeitsplätze vernichtet, sagt Google-Chef Sundar Pichai, dass es an den gewöhnlichen Menschen liegt, sich entsprechend anzupassen: „Wir müssen mit gesellschaftlichen Umwälzungen zurechtkommen.“

    https://fortune.com/2025/12/02/ai-wipes-jobs-google-ceo-sundar-pichai-everyday-people-to-adapt-accordingly-we-have-to-work-through-societal-disruption/

    Share.

    39 Kommentare

    1. “We’re going to annihilate the job market but don’t worry you can just find something else to do”.

    2. DressedSpring1 on

      „We“ will have to work through societal disruption.

      He means „a handful of us are going to become even more unfathomably rich and you will have to work through societal disruption“.

      Fuckin „we“ bullshit

    3. SeeRecursion on

      Well, Pichai, if it’s on everyone else to clean up your messes, then I guess we owe you nothing.

    4. goingofftrack on

      How do you work through social disruption when that social disruption is a lack of jobs?

    5. Able_Elderberry3725 on

      „Societal disruption“.

      It’s so irritating when they sanitize things that way. What he means is joblessness, homelessness, upheaval without equal in human history. The overhyped perceived worth of „AI“ is dishonest. These are chatbots that can do a lot, yes, but they cannot possibly realize the gains quickly enough for quarterly-thinking investors. They suck up all the damn energy, they’re polluting, they’re filling the Internet with „hallucinations“.

      The algorithm is wrecking us.

    6. Finest_Johnson on

      As if „just turning this AI shit off“ isn’t an available option to avoid this „societal disruption.“

      Fuck off.

    7. DrunkenDognuts on

      How is it that Google just went full on evil when their motto used to be “do no evil?”

    8. I think what he is saying is to start wiping out more CEOs to avoid Societal disruption

    9. encrypted-signals on

      McKinsey consultants exist to take everything good about a company, destroy it, and rebuild it in a way it can be monetized. That is what Pichai has done for 11 years, and now Google is a flaming turd.

    10. Pale-and-Willing on

      Like deploying the military in every city in America so stomp down unrest?

    11. Troubleshooter11 on

      „people should pursue whatever career they want, regardless of how the tech changes the job landscape.“

      That’s an extremely bad piece of advice. It is the equivalant of saying saying cars will replace 90% of horses as main form of transportation but please continue to invest years and tens of thousands of dollars into becoming a horse trainer if that is what you want to become.

      This is how millions of young people end up in massive debt and a useless degree, while living in a country where the leaders see lending aid to people as a sin….oh and those young people have easy access to guns. What could possibly go wrong?

    12. Sensitive_Ruin_5334 on

      „We’re all in this together.“ I’m not sure if he fully comprehends that „societal disruption“ means that we will be coming after him.

    13. The problem is… no one asked for this. It doesn’t benefit the ones paying the “societal” cost. This motherfucker needs to learn how to read the room.

      Fuck AI. That bubble can’t pop fast enough…

    14. What I’m getting from these guys is that we should vote against any regulations (because of economy!), have more children, while also adapting to the reality where it’s going to be very difficult for many to have a decent job, because of AI.

      In sane world, we would put a brakes on this stuff until we better figure out what to do and not invest trillions into black hole under the guise of future returns. But instead we’re here where we can’t possibly impede our glorious AI future because market would crash and people would lose their investments.

      Basically large mega corporations are holding the entire economy hostage in their pursuit of growth. Tech giants should’ve been broken up years ago in anti-trust actions, they’re too big for anyone’s good.

    15. SuperXpression on

      How ironic using the word “work” as they literally remove the ability to do so. I think we should follow their own advice and start publicly hanging these billionaire bastards that work so hard to make the world so much worse for everyone else.

    16. Ok-Drive-9685 on

      It’s amusing to see these “people” talk about how life changing AI will be…for their business/benefit. They say “We” sometimes but what have they done to abate the precipice that they so boldly point out? Saying “We” does not mean they’re in the trenches too. 

      If capital plans to eliminate labor then capital holders are no longer necessary. AI creates socialism/communism because it takes away the need for a human beings to problem solve. How are they capitalists again? 

      Our intelligence is what is being replaced. The AI pushers want a golden source that they can utilize for their benefit.  We have the ideas and they had the money to buy our efforts. If that’s gone what is remaining? Do they get to hold on to the capital while we get to slowly starve to death? 

      Average person working towards AI is actually working at gun point with the “promise” that they won’t shoot us when it’s done. This is all pretty sickening. 

      What do I know? I’m just a random thinking human being not shiny AI. 

    17. Why is an unelected official being allowed to alter the fabric of society

    18. Lego_Chicken on

      And by “we,” I mean, “you,” and by “work,” I mean, “starve.”

    19. InfraredDiarrhea on

      As a regular every day person, im tired of changing my life and making accommodations for the brain farts of these over-fed and under-tought trouser stains. 

    20. Independent-Barber-2 on

      Whose „we“? We are building a tech that: (1) we don’t need; (2) will hurt massive numbers of people; and (3) will only make a small sliver of the rich even freakin‘ richer (shifting more wealth from the masses). Eventually there will be a revolt.

    21. llehctim3750 on

      It’s beginning to feel like it’s time to find the second foundation.

    22. Can we work through societal disruptions by taxing the ever-living fuck out of those causing said disruptions?

    23. bluehawk232 on

      That worked out well for the rust belt didn’t it? Close all the factories then tell the workers guess you have to find something else and they were stuck with crappy minimum wage jobs as like the only option

    24. The needle the wealthy have been able to thread so far is keeping the masses satisfied enough to stay in line. They’ve been able to sell the less informed a bill of goods and to even convince some of them that the wealthy are necessary (in the same way kings used to proclaim themselves ordained by God).

      At one point, however, they are going to go too far and its all going to unravel. Maybe they can get away to their bunkers at that time but society is going to flame out unless things change massively.

    25. It is weird because if people don’t have jobs they cannot pay for things so the system starts to collapse unless you tax those making money and create universal income. Which I doubt he is for.

      Alot of these tech people are honestly monsters in alot of respects in their lack of ethical concerns and practical concerns.

    26. Genuine question, I am in the US and see how this will impact us. Is this now a global problem? Will Europe be impacted? Asia? Are these parts of the world looking at unemployment issues as well?

    27. twink-here21 on

      Says the guy not affected by the said societal disruption. Fuck off sir. Respectfully.

    Leave A Reply