Das Buch heißt "Geschichte der Religionen" und wurde von Carlos Cid und Manuel Riu geschrieben. Jemand hat es bereits gescannt und online hochgeladen, aber vergessen, diese wunderbare Karte hinzuzufügen, weil sie sich auf der letzten Seite befindet. https://es.scribd.com/document/487300161/Historia-de-las-religiones
Von elreduro
8 Kommentare
I like that it uses ‘undetermined‘ instead of just generalizing.
Schismatic Greeks
The labelling of various major capital cities as Jewish is rather suspect. The label of „Schismatic-Greek“ (*cismático-griega*) instead of „Eastern Orthodox“ is also suspect – the heads of the orthodox churches of Russian, Romanian, Serbian, Bulgarian, Georgian, etc. rank behind the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople who is also head of the Greek Orthodox Church, but they are not themselves Greek.
Surprised on how exagerated „undetermined“ is in south america. In the 60s finding anywhere in the continent that wasn’t catholic would be hard
Um, 60 years ago it was possible to determine the religious affiliations of people living in Arctic Canada. It was 1965. So that’s a little frustrating.
Which were to understand what these other Christian groups are in Brazil. It doesn’t make sense, since Catholics were a huge majority throughout the country. The only considerable Christian minority were Protestants, who could not have been even 5% at that time. Does anyone know the answer?
Notably unreliable – East Pakistan existed 60 years ago, to divide Muslims from Hindu-majority India and isn’t shown. Sri Lanka is majority Buddhist and that’s not a new thing. Undetermined is used way too widely. I suspect the map’s creator back then didn’t know half what they thought they did.
Why is half the US randomly labelled „other Christians“? The only area where this would be correct is the LDS belt in/around Utah, the rest should be Protestant or Catholic.