Hier sind alle (29) Pixar-Filme und ihre Bewertung laut Rotten Tomatoes. Einfaches Diagramm, erstellt mit Datawrapper.
Toy Story und Toy Story 2 haben beide eine 100%-Bewertung! Laut Rotten Tomatoes schnitt Cars 2 mit 40 % am schlechtesten ab Faul (im Gegensatz zu Frisch oder Zertifiziert frisch), aber Cars 3 machte einen kleinen Aufschwung. Sind Sie mit den Ergebnissen einverstanden? Wenn ich mich für eines entscheiden muss, denke ich "Der gute Dinosaurier" sollte höher bewertet werden (ein oft vergessener Pixar-Film).
Für die interaktive Version: https://www.datawrapper.de/_/cM44A/
Von shinyro
24 Kommentare
Could you change the green dots into red or rotten tomatoes?
Should have put the sequel on the same line so we can direct compare with our eyes instead of me having to put my finger on the screen to not lose my place.
Good data. Not beautiful
It’s very difficult to visually align the movie to its score with this format. If there were different colored rows or some other type of lines it would be a lot more beautiful
Huh, anyone know what people dislike about Cars? Even the first one is almost the lowest rated on the chart. As a dad of toddlers I watched it for the first time recently and enjoyed it, surprised to see that.
What is wrong with the Good Dinosaur?
I would just clip Cars 2 and tighten up the graph, starting at 70%
Tf is that CLANKER doing on my screen 🤬
Not gonna lie bro the random Wall-E and tiny Woody make this not very beautiful to me. It would mean more if those two movies were actually the highest rated, but they aren’t. The visuals mean nothing
I guess I don’t understand the logic being separating sequels and originals. Chronological order of all movies would do just fine
Biggest issues with the scores overall is that Wall-E should be higher.
Maybe add the year next to the sequels? The temporal aspect is kind of destroyed, I imagine there is a better way of making the sequels distinct.
hard to believe any of them were worse than the good dinosaur. it’s the only pixar movie i ever considered walking out of the theater during
Minor quibble but Rotten Tomatoes doesn’t provide a rating, it provides a score. The score is based on the ratings that are given to it by reviewers, but only considers whether the rating is positive or negative. It’s a ratio of positive reviews and not necessarily a rating in and of itself.
Is Inside Out 2 that much better than the OG?
I know IO1 went under a lot of radars, but it was one of my favorites!!
what’s with the clipart
Putting aside that RT’s system of reading is very flawed in the first place, did you use „critics“ or audience scores? If the former, you really need to redo this chart.
Surprised Elemental is that low, it was a visually stunning, heartfelt movie with some good laughs.
sorting by score would make more sense
Elemental is so underrated. It’s a great movie
Kinda hilarious that Cars, probably the most profitable franchise they have after Toy Story, has 3 of the lowest 5 or 6 scores.
Really shows that nobody cares if the movie is good, whats important is if it can push merch.
Car 2 did suck royally, but I have to say Cars 3 hit pretty hard, especially when Lightning is training with Cruz Ramirez and he thinks he’s back to form and she easily passes him in a race where they were just having fun. He came to the realization that time was passing him by and he needed to give up the torch.
Your title says „highest rated Pixar films“ but the first line of text says it’s ALL of the Pixar films.
Well what is it?
I feel like this graph would benefit from:
1) Remove the wall-e. He’s cute but it distracts from the chart.
2) flipping the axes so the movie is on the bottom.
Cars 3 was so good why is it only 70%??? And why is cars barely ahead of that??