Child safety is important, but Congress uses it as a smokescreen for bolstering the surveillance state.
Demonking3343 on
They always have been filled with poison pills.
EmbarrassedHelp on
Why the fuck is the author citing the Christan fascist and extremist organization known as the Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE), as though their voice should matter?
They used to call themselves Morality in Media, and they literally view anything sex related as „exploitation“.
EscapeFacebook on
It’s not about safety it’s about removing your personal rights and your personal responsibility. The founders of project 2025 say so in their own words.
We already saved the children. Parental controls exist. Use them. No, I won’t think of the children, we already did that a decade ago. The problem is already solved.
Beautiful-Fig7824 on
All the „safety is more important than freedom“ people are going to be really upset when hamburgers in kid’s meals get banned for increasing the risk of colorectal cancer. Let’s ban kids from swimming, being in cars, and playing sports too. That’ll reduce danger & save some lives.
Jazzlike-Ad7974 on
At what point do we start holding parents accountable? Is it because it’s too easy?
Virtual-Oil-5021 on
Pokemon is gambling but fifa cards are ok … Fucj off all bills are smookscreen
LanLinked on
Good, „kid’s online safety“ means it’s a censorship bill.
Helpful-Macaroon-654 on
the ‘‘Shielding Children’s
Retinas from Egregious Exposure on the Net Act’’ or the
‘‘SCREEN Act’’.
That’s what they came up with?!
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
11 Kommentare
Still they could try to add any of the bills to the NDAA and rush them into law so here a list of bad US internet bills and how to contact your Rep.
http://www.badinternetbills.com
Support the EFF and FFTF.
Link to there sites
http://www.eff.org
http://www.fightforthefuture.org
And Free Speech Coalition
http://www.freespeechcoalition.com
All online child safely bills *are* poison pills.
Child safety is important, but Congress uses it as a smokescreen for bolstering the surveillance state.
They always have been filled with poison pills.
Why the fuck is the author citing the Christan fascist and extremist organization known as the Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE), as though their voice should matter?
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Center_on_Sexual_Exploitation
They used to call themselves Morality in Media, and they literally view anything sex related as „exploitation“.
It’s not about safety it’s about removing your personal rights and your personal responsibility. The founders of project 2025 say so in their own words.
https://youtu.be/0noIS9lmR0Y?si=TTN_Ut_HFfAEKs0t
We already saved the children. Parental controls exist. Use them. No, I won’t think of the children, we already did that a decade ago. The problem is already solved.
All the „safety is more important than freedom“ people are going to be really upset when hamburgers in kid’s meals get banned for increasing the risk of colorectal cancer. Let’s ban kids from swimming, being in cars, and playing sports too. That’ll reduce danger & save some lives.
At what point do we start holding parents accountable? Is it because it’s too easy?
Pokemon is gambling but fifa cards are ok … Fucj off all bills are smookscreen
Good, „kid’s online safety“ means it’s a censorship bill.
the ‘‘Shielding Children’s
Retinas from Egregious Exposure on the Net Act’’ or the
‘‘SCREEN Act’’.
That’s what they came up with?!