Ich höre oft Leute sagen, es sei dazu gedacht, Produkte derselben Kategorie zu vergleichen. Das stimmt nicht, denn alle Lebensmittel werden gleich berechnet. Außerdem ist es immer noch völliger Unsinn, wie Sie hier sehen können.
https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1pd2c02
Von 123964
7 Kommentare
at this point it must be paid off and the bio industry also pays them to „healthwash“ it
The only thing I’m getting from this is: I should scam people with diet consulting, seems like a branch where bullshitting others is encouraged
ah echt? da wisten we nog nie.
wie kijkt daar ook naar? ik alleen naar de ingredienten en de suikers en vezels eigenlijk ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I have seen two literally identical products but in different size packages have different nutriscores.
Their nutritional value was exactly the same in both, the portion sizes were exactly the same in both, but the score differed from B to C.
Completely pointless.
it IS ment to compare across the same category, but there’s only like 5 categories in total.
That being said. the nutriscore calculation was completely revised a while back, chances are some of these products are still using the old categories instead of the new, making everything extra confusing…
I’ve literally had multiple products of the same brand & packaging with different labels, because some were manufactured before the revised category and some were manufactured after.
I took these pictures in aldi last week:
https://imgur.com/a/DBu4KAS
Cecemel and aldi brand are exactly the same except cecemel has 1g/100ml more sugar and thus a little more kcal/100ml. But cecemel is B and aldi brand is E
I honestly started thinking it’s just that you pay for better nutri score
Nutri score is determined by comparison between products of the same category, which it doesn’t disclose.
So the „healthiest“ microwave pizza will have a higher nutri score than the least healthy salad.