Speaking in the north-eastern town of Mirecourt on Friday, French President Emmanuel Macron said he had asked his government to draw up proposals for new summary proceedings that could be used when defamatory or harmful claims spread across social networks.
The aim, he said, is to have a mechanism firmly anchored in French legislation “as soon as possible”.
The French leader revealed that he had convened a defence council dedicated to “information warfare”, tasking officials with completing their work by the end of the year
It forms part of a broader campaign to tackle what Paris sees as an escalation in hostile foreign propaganda, particularly from Russia since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022
Macron and his wife, Brigitte, have themselves been persistent targets of online conspiracy theories – most notably the baseless claim that the First Lady was born male.
The couple say such attacks have taken a personal toll, with the president admitting he has faced online harassment and that Brigitte has endured “even more”.
“We are completely powerless,” he told regional press. “It takes an enormous amount of time, it continues, people see it, and there are those who are foolish enough to believe it is true. And that undermines you.”
Sirvaleen on
Just had to make it personal to him for disinformation to suddenly become a national problem, it’s not like it has been disruptive for years
MandrakeLicker on
In other words, allow immediate censorship of anything contradicting the party line.
99thLuftballon on
I expect a lot of people who identify themselves as on the right or far right will be posting „Nooooooo! We must allow misinformation!“, but in the end, it is a weapon being used against western societies, and it needs to be stopped somehow, even if that way isn’t perfect.
me-Unit7738 on
Who determines what disinformation is?
Commercial-Kiwi9690 on
Can the people not think for themselves? Why not focus on teaching critical thinking?
TheMericanIdiot on
Finally we need to fight back against the disinformation make it illegal.
satoshisfeverdream on
Is the fact that his wife is his former older male teacher considered disinformation?
Lobster15s on
Standards for media aren’t new, Standards for media already exist. We should have done something about blatant lies and racism a long time ago but now is a start. In fact if we don’t do anything about this accounts on Russia, India, Africa, Asia are gonna have more control over narratives in our own countries than we do. As is currently the case by the way.
BapeGeneral3 on
„In Russian there are two words for truth. Pravda is man’s truth. Istina is God’s truth. But there is also nepravda—untruth. And this is the weapon the leader uses. Because he knows what they don’t. The truth is whatever he says it is“.
Fargo Season 3, Episode 4
Prudent_Trickutro on
These ”democrats” are nothing more than oppressors. They feel their grip is slipping.
Segel_le_vrai on
Macron has no majority, no budget, no army, no industry … but he speaks a lot.
Hairy_Addendum7789 on
Ministry of truth…
Alternative_Ask8636 on
Idk, I still believe in freedom of the press, but something does have to be done about sites like x pushing nonsense on the uneducated. Social media censorship? While other sites can post whatever they want? You should at least have to go to some crackpot website to get your crackpot news. Community note blockage? Idk.
ImprovementMain7109 on
You can make a decent case for taking foreign disinfo seriously, especially around elections, but “rapid blocking” laws always end up as “the state + platforms decide what’s true under time pressure.” That means overblocking, zero transparency, and effectively turning intermediaries into a political speech police.
shaun2312 on
Who defines what is misinformation?
NoWayYesWayMaybeWay on
I hate that the world becomes more authoritarian by the day.
This is a disgusting law, and people who are cheering this on won’t see the snake coming that will bite them eventually.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
17 Kommentare
Speaking in the north-eastern town of Mirecourt on Friday, French President Emmanuel Macron said he had asked his government to draw up proposals for new summary proceedings that could be used when defamatory or harmful claims spread across social networks.
The aim, he said, is to have a mechanism firmly anchored in French legislation “as soon as possible”.
The French leader revealed that he had convened a defence council dedicated to “information warfare”, tasking officials with completing their work by the end of the year
It forms part of a broader campaign to tackle what Paris sees as an escalation in hostile foreign propaganda, particularly from Russia since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022
Macron and his wife, Brigitte, have themselves been persistent targets of online conspiracy theories – most notably the baseless claim that the First Lady was born male.
The couple say such attacks have taken a personal toll, with the president admitting he has faced online harassment and that Brigitte has endured “even more”.
“We are completely powerless,” he told regional press. “It takes an enormous amount of time, it continues, people see it, and there are those who are foolish enough to believe it is true. And that undermines you.”
Just had to make it personal to him for disinformation to suddenly become a national problem, it’s not like it has been disruptive for years
In other words, allow immediate censorship of anything contradicting the party line.
I expect a lot of people who identify themselves as on the right or far right will be posting „Nooooooo! We must allow misinformation!“, but in the end, it is a weapon being used against western societies, and it needs to be stopped somehow, even if that way isn’t perfect.
Who determines what disinformation is?
Can the people not think for themselves? Why not focus on teaching critical thinking?
Finally we need to fight back against the disinformation make it illegal.
Is the fact that his wife is his former older male teacher considered disinformation?
Standards for media aren’t new, Standards for media already exist. We should have done something about blatant lies and racism a long time ago but now is a start. In fact if we don’t do anything about this accounts on Russia, India, Africa, Asia are gonna have more control over narratives in our own countries than we do. As is currently the case by the way.
„In Russian there are two words for truth. Pravda is man’s truth. Istina is God’s truth. But there is also nepravda—untruth. And this is the weapon the leader uses. Because he knows what they don’t. The truth is whatever he says it is“.
Fargo Season 3, Episode 4
These ”democrats” are nothing more than oppressors. They feel their grip is slipping.
Macron has no majority, no budget, no army, no industry … but he speaks a lot.
Ministry of truth…
Idk, I still believe in freedom of the press, but something does have to be done about sites like x pushing nonsense on the uneducated. Social media censorship? While other sites can post whatever they want? You should at least have to go to some crackpot website to get your crackpot news. Community note blockage? Idk.
You can make a decent case for taking foreign disinfo seriously, especially around elections, but “rapid blocking” laws always end up as “the state + platforms decide what’s true under time pressure.” That means overblocking, zero transparency, and effectively turning intermediaries into a political speech police.
Who defines what is misinformation?
I hate that the world becomes more authoritarian by the day.
This is a disgusting law, and people who are cheering this on won’t see the snake coming that will bite them eventually.