Pentagon Pete wegen „Tötet sie alle“-Befehl in rechtlicher Gefahr: Eine Folgerakete tötete angeblich Überlebende eines US-Angriffs auf ein Drogenboot.

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/pentagon-pete-in-legal-peril-over-kill-them-all-orders/

    Share.

    27 Kommentare

    1. Silent-Resort-3076 on

      Various snippets: EDITED to add:

      *Here is the non paywalled article:* [https://archive.is/20251128210929/https://www.thedailybeast.com/pentagon-pete-in-legal-peril-over-kill-them-all-orders/](https://archive.is/20251128210929/https://www.thedailybeast.com/pentagon-pete-in-legal-peril-over-kill-them-all-orders/)

      * Former military lawyer Todd Huntley, director of the national security law program at Georgetown Law, said a decision to kill all the boat’s helpless passengers “would in essence be an order to show no quarter, which would be a war crime.”
      * He told the Post that killing any of the people on the boat “amounts to murder.”
      * Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said the “entire narrative is completely false.”
      * He added: “Ongoing operations to dismantle narcoterrorism and to protect the Homeland from deadly drugs have been a resounding success.”
      * “They’re breaking the law either way,” Sarah Harrison, a former associate general counsel at the Pentagon, told CNN.
      * “They’re killing civilians in the first place, and then if you assume they’re combatants, it’s also unlawful—under the law of armed conflict, if somebody is ‘hors de combat’ and no longer able to fight, then they have to be treated humanely.”
      * The U.K. has stopped sharing intelligence about the movements of suspected drug traffickers in the Caribbean because it believes the U.S. military action is illegal.

    2. They haven’t proven it was a drug boat. Stop fucking calling it a drug boat.

    3. Well, yeah. The entire justification they’re using for these killings is illegal.

    4. Service members better smarten up and realize that it is their duty to disobey illegal orders and it doesn’t get any more illegal than following the order to kill survivors, not only is it against US law it’s also against international law and the Genova convention.

    5. ChopperChange on

      This is what happens when you put a racist drunk FOX pundit in charge of the military.

    6. Mr_Magoo1969 on

      In an ideal world, Whiskey Pete gets detained on his next European junket by a country with a better grasp of international law.

    7. FayeGossamer on

      Honestly, if even military law experts are calling it murder, then this isn’t some ‘fog of war‘ excuse anymore…it’s straight up accountability time. You can’t preach rule of law globally while ignoring it at home. If commanders can just order follow-up strikes on survivors with Zero consequence, what message does that send?

    8. Ok-Lets-Talk-It-Out on

      *Rule 47. Attacking persons who are recognized as hors de combat is prohibited. A person hors de combat is:*

      *(a) anyone who is in the power of an adverse party;*

      **(b) anyone who is defenceless because of unconsciousness, shipwreck, wounds or sickness; or**

      *(c) anyone who clearly expresses an intention to surrender;
      provided he or she abstains from any hostile act and does not attempt to escape*

      https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/customary-ihl/v1/rule47

    9. Gitmo_Janitor on

      Whiskey Dick Peter is not in ‘peril’. Who’s going to stop him? The orange shit heel?

    10. This is probably the reason for warning from Senator Kelly et al to not obey illegal orders.

    11. justbecauseyoumademe on

      Doubletapping civilians that have not been convicted of any crimes is by itself a crime against humanity 

    12. I hate drug gangs, but this is fucking piracy, murder, and crimes against humanity. We literally hung people for this back in the day. There are laws, and our government is acting like the biggest fucking criminal on the high seas. I live abroad, so maybe I shouldn’t speak out of turn, but the fact that we Americans are not literally revolting in the streets with fucking machine guns right now is fucking unbelievable. For a country which encouraged other people to do this in their own tyrranical nations for eighty years, and then to turn around and say that we are not going to do that ourselves is the the biggest fucking hypocrisy I have ever seen. Ever. It is fucking astounding. Every American should be fucking ashamed. I sure the fuck am.

    13. Anishinaapunk on

      And MAGA wonders why soldiers have to be reminded not to follow illegal orders.

    14. this would also on its face be an illegal order, meaning everyone involved would be responsible.

      that being said, the idea that drugs are somehow arms and these people are combatants is also absurd.

    15. justinpaulson on

      And you followed the order to kill them all? This is one of those illegal orders they were talking about.

    16. Careful-Rent5779 on

      Beter that no witnesses survive (/s).

      Or course it makes Kelly’s (and others) warnings about not following illegal orders more relavent. Targeting an alleged drug boat is one thing. Killing helpless survivours is another thing entirely. Service persons involved in any follow-up attack are equally cupable.

    17. Sweethomebflo on

      If democrats aren’t standing up and screaming for this goon to get fired and charged with everything, wtf are we doing?

    18. Voodoo_Masta on

      God I cannot wait for this war criminal to spend the rest of his miserable life behind bars

    19. What “legal peril” & from who?! They own the DOJ & decide what the laws are as they go along.

    Leave A Reply