Hooray, the cardinals have selected a new album of posthumous Prince demo tracks!
CFCYYZ on
This Sarmat failure strongly resembles the [Proton M failure of July 2013.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycRVAcZC5R4).
There, three of the first stage angular velocity sensors, responsible for yaw control, were installed in an incorrect orientation. As the error affected the redundant sensors as well as the primary ones, the rocket was left with no yaw control, which resulted in the failure.
HydrolicKrane on
The article below was written a couple of years ago.
„Russia tried to copy Ukraine-made most powerful Intercontinental Ballistic Missile SS-18 Satan. The copy, Sarmat ICBM, has just failed for the sixth time in a row“
Today’s failure is #7 then.
WesternBlueRanger on
This would be failure number five of this specific missile type; they’ve had four previous launch failures:
I’m kinda confused, are they live testing their icbms to see if they still work?
WatRedditHathWrought on
I just want everyone to be aware that united24media is state owned media of Ukraine. That being said Slava Ukraine. May russians be sunflower fertilizer.
hukep on
The only good thing about Putin’s regime is that it’s absolutely corrupt. No one can be sure whether anything will work or not.
VanbyRiveronbucket on
Remember during the Iraq war, the scud missles were launched, and then they turned on CNN to see where they landed?? Russia reminds me of this.
Ok-Review-3047 on
Russian engineering
Due_Equipment7899 on
Another Russian failure – which, of course, can only mean one thing: Trump should give Putin everything he wants
tomonota on
An apparent launch failure for the 2d time related to the liquid fuel propulsion system- which formerly was designed by Ukrainian scientists but who stopped assisting Russian engineers after the 2014 invasion of Crimea and Eastern Ukraine. This same rocket exploded in a prior launch failure, leaving an enormous crater at the launch site. This missile was said to be able to threaten London and Copenhagen- but maybe just a tiny bit.
ComputationalPoet on
Wouldn’t it be rad if we later find out that a stuxnet for angular velocity sensors is being used on them. I would hope we have some black program for messing with russian icbms.
macross1984 on
Russia is getting consistently good at botching launch testing.
Elegant_Spring2223 on
Prvo to je ruska snimka na poligonu, no nema njihovu potvrdu kada je i zašto došlo do kvara senzora ili programa ugaone brzine.
Kiiaru on
Didn’t they just lose a launch site a week ago from another failed rocket test?
MightyIrish on
Russia can’t get it up.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
16 Kommentare
Hooray, the cardinals have selected a new album of posthumous Prince demo tracks!
This Sarmat failure strongly resembles the [Proton M failure of July 2013.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycRVAcZC5R4).
There, three of the first stage angular velocity sensors, responsible for yaw control, were installed in an incorrect orientation. As the error affected the redundant sensors as well as the primary ones, the rocket was left with no yaw control, which resulted in the failure.
The article below was written a couple of years ago.
„Russia tried to copy Ukraine-made most powerful Intercontinental Ballistic Missile SS-18 Satan. The copy, Sarmat ICBM, has just failed for the sixth time in a row“
Today’s failure is #7 then.
This would be failure number five of this specific missile type; they’ve had four previous launch failures:
[https://www.newsweek.com/satellite-images-reveal-russia-failed-nuclear-missile-test-report-1957495](https://www.newsweek.com/satellite-images-reveal-russia-failed-nuclear-missile-test-report-1957495)
I’m kinda confused, are they live testing their icbms to see if they still work?
I just want everyone to be aware that united24media is state owned media of Ukraine. That being said Slava Ukraine. May russians be sunflower fertilizer.
The only good thing about Putin’s regime is that it’s absolutely corrupt. No one can be sure whether anything will work or not.
Remember during the Iraq war, the scud missles were launched, and then they turned on CNN to see where they landed?? Russia reminds me of this.
Russian engineering
Another Russian failure – which, of course, can only mean one thing: Trump should give Putin everything he wants
An apparent launch failure for the 2d time related to the liquid fuel propulsion system- which formerly was designed by Ukrainian scientists but who stopped assisting Russian engineers after the 2014 invasion of Crimea and Eastern Ukraine. This same rocket exploded in a prior launch failure, leaving an enormous crater at the launch site. This missile was said to be able to threaten London and Copenhagen- but maybe just a tiny bit.
Wouldn’t it be rad if we later find out that a stuxnet for angular velocity sensors is being used on them. I would hope we have some black program for messing with russian icbms.
Russia is getting consistently good at botching launch testing.
Prvo to je ruska snimka na poligonu, no nema njihovu potvrdu kada je i zašto došlo do kvara senzora ili programa ugaone brzine.
Didn’t they just lose a launch site a week ago from another failed rocket test?
Russia can’t get it up.