[OC] Flugunfälle pro Modell pro 1000 produzierten Modellen
Von PeakClassic9820
[OC] Flugunfälle pro Modell pro 1000 produzierten Modellen
Von PeakClassic9820
6 Kommentare
TLDR : forgot to add source and tool
source : NTSB , ASN manual scraping
tool : power bi
This seems like the perfect use case for a logarithmic scale. Outside of „Comet is even worse than I thought“ and „172 is surprisingly safe“, I’m not sure what the take-away is here. Can’t see any of the data, really.
How does the Havilland Comet have 800+ accidents per thousand? What’s the story behind that?
high scale PDF : [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1l6A6JISMiqmsF657KjLqS7FG9OmHuIaA/view?usp=sharing](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1l6A6JISMiqmsF657KjLqS7FG9OmHuIaA/view?usp=sharing)
This is a really bad graph.
Your outliers are totally overshadowing the average, and the vast majority of data points cannot be properly differentiated. Nor are they labeled.
The only takeaways form this graph are that a few models crash often, and a few crash very little. With no explanation as to why.
Lots of ways to better represent this information such that 99% of it isn’t useless.
This is not beautiful. It’s unreadable.