Stunden vor der Schießerei in D.C. kam es zu einem Anstieg der Google-Suchanfragen nach dem Namen des Schützen. Ich sehe auch Beweise dafür, dass am 20. November in DC nach ihm gesucht wurde.
Stunden vor der Schießerei in D.C. kam es zu einem Anstieg der Google-Suchanfragen nach dem Namen des Schützen. Ich sehe auch Beweise dafür, dass am 20. November in DC nach ihm gesucht wurde.
Submission statement: Google trends is revealing that people in DC knew who he was hours before the shooting occurred. Is the CIA behind the murder of two US soldiers near the White House? Did they direct/orchestrate this act of war? Take a close look at the gunman’s ID card going around on X today. It’s clear he was a member of the Qandahar Strike Force, a CIA-backed paramilitary unit. He’s one of theirs
Surging_Sparkz on
Same thing with Tyler… this is so real
Affectionate-Mood728 on
Why should someone Google something knowing that it not (yet) happened!?
IAmNumberFourI on
I love you guys for doing this research most of the Media will absolutely never do.
bitchdotcomdotcom on
Wag that dog.
Short-Personality398 on
Would it possibly have something to do with time zone differences?
SleepingSicarii on
You need to provide more information with your screenshot. I matched up what’s in your screenshot and even VPN’d to a virtual location near Washington DC and turned off all localisation/converting/redirecting in the URL request
What I found is (besides Google’s anomaly with how Trends work) the incident and first “search” are 3 minutes apart, with actually the search being first before the actual event happened, which backs up this post, however, again, Trends works in a weird- and sometimes inaccurate way especially when considering indexing, “featured” stories on websites, backdating, incorrect reporting/times.
It’s interesting to consider this (the screenshot/post) but even if this was premeditated, why would there be searches for the name if it were to be found out?
Choice-Control2648 on
>why would there be searches for the name of it were to be found out
Maybe the people searching don’t consider this. Is it not plausible that local law enforcement could have received a tip on the suspect and used Google to corroborate the tip with information on the suspect?
the_cnidarian on
He googled his own name to see if he anybody was talking about something else he is related to.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
9 Kommentare
Submission statement: Google trends is revealing that people in DC knew who he was hours before the shooting occurred. Is the CIA behind the murder of two US soldiers near the White House? Did they direct/orchestrate this act of war? Take a close look at the gunman’s ID card going around on X today. It’s clear he was a member of the Qandahar Strike Force, a CIA-backed paramilitary unit. He’s one of theirs
Same thing with Tyler… this is so real
Why should someone Google something knowing that it not (yet) happened!?
I love you guys for doing this research most of the Media will absolutely never do.
Wag that dog.
Would it possibly have something to do with time zone differences?
You need to provide more information with your screenshot. I matched up what’s in your screenshot and even VPN’d to a virtual location near Washington DC and turned off all localisation/converting/redirecting in the URL request
What I found is (besides Google’s anomaly with how Trends work) the incident and first “search” are 3 minutes apart, with actually the search being first before the actual event happened, which backs up this post, however, again, Trends works in a weird- and sometimes inaccurate way especially when considering indexing, “featured” stories on websites, backdating, incorrect reporting/times.
It’s interesting to consider this (the screenshot/post) but even if this was premeditated, why would there be searches for the name if it were to be found out?
>why would there be searches for the name of it were to be found out
Maybe the people searching don’t consider this. Is it not plausible that local law enforcement could have received a tip on the suspect and used Google to corroborate the tip with information on the suspect?
He googled his own name to see if he anybody was talking about something else he is related to.