Share.

    31 Kommentare

    1. Melodic_Sell7718 on

      Possible. Anything is possible these days. Also to keep a platform that big, perhaps even more possible. He’s not really challenging the big issue, the money system after all. I mean is he actually challenging capitalism? No. Of course not.

      Also, to be seen as controlled opposition, you’d have to, ya know, subscribe to their views. I’m a leftist, of the old school variety so with Tucker, that’s kinda gonna be problematic. LoL. I like his anti war stance though. Nuance can exist. People forget that in these times.

    2. no. Tucker and Jones are gen x spokesperson. Candace/Ian/Dave Smith are Millennial’s spokesperson, Fuentes is Zoomers and Kelley is Boomers. These people aren’t 100% over the target but they are 90-95% over the target.

      Control opposition would be Andrew Tate, Jack Posobiac, Benny Johnson and anyone on daily wire.

      Don’t underestimate the enemy but don’t overestimate them either. There’s a reason why Tuckers home got attacked by a mob, Jones got sued into infinity, Candace is on a hitlist, and Fuentes almost got killed by a dude on a killing spree.

    3. hannahsquats on

      Doesn’t seem like it but I guess anything is possible. I listen to each of them with that in mind. If they are, they are doing a pretty good job at fooling everyone.

    4. sHaDowpUpPetxxx on

      Yes, are you shitting me. I think 70% of the people on Reddit are controlled opposition.

    5. T4nkcommander on

      All of them. Anyone who isn’t controlled op and speaks truth that is not pre approved has their life ruined/ended.

    6. sickdawg0311 on

      Every single person that actually gets political engagement on Twitter is controlled….

    7. Generally, anyone propped up in the alternative media scene is not to be trusted. There is footage showing Tucker is a devout [Kabbalist](https://youtu.be/UKs7PezOoCg). Known disinfo agents like [Alex Jones](https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxojVToXpiDO6BFztkxsQE-dWFUC4BHhlN?si=LhTv_6S23iPq2E2k) have repeatedly praised initiatives such as NASA and Israel’s Iron Dome. Both these projects have been argued to be mere money-laundering operations. If you want the full story, you’ll need to resort to underground channels. I personally view the[ LimitlessChannel](https://www.youtube.com/live/Yvh5z5Vfi-Q?t=863s).

    8. Legal_Ant_8900 on

      My honest thoughts:

      I don’t get that vibe from Cenk or Ana. Am I naive?

      I don’t think Nick is, if anything because he’s often his own worst enemy.

      Candace.. not sure.

      Tucker maybe.

      Alex yes.

    9. Aggressive_Access270 on

      I think a lot of people who look into the abyss literally lose their minds witu the knowledge of how crazy our world really is.

    10. harddrivebackup on

      “Controlled opposition” is putting it lightly. They are crisis actors putting on a show. We just don’t know exactly who they work for

    11. harddrivebackup on

      Real dissidents don’t receive coverage on mainstream news and circulated into the entire public’s news feed

    12. 💯
      Nobody who is thrusted into the spotlight is of their free will. They’re all controlled

    13. concentric0s on

      Tucker was sooooo wrong and bought in to the 2 party system lie for so long.

      Like how can one ever forgive and forget how hardcore he was stumping and bootlicking for the Red Team in the Red vs Blue false narrative.

      He had front row seats.

      And it STILL took him super long to realize what a blowhard he was being.

      To be that vocal and sure of oneself but so very very wrong.

      And to now be just as sure if himself and loud…

      Ergo he is still a blowhard, stumping, bootlicking dumbass just playing a role for media clout and $$$.

      Joe Rogan showed these people with following a path to make more $$$.

      And they know they need to play up the independent thinker role to win $$$ and media share.

      Scum

    14. rimeswithburple on

      I don’t believe even Alex Jones controls Alex Jones much less some shadowy agency.

    15. As much as I hate his politics, Nick Fuentes might be the only one that’s not.

    16. Poop_Cheese on

      I genuinely believe Candace is right about a lot, but she gets so schizo about it where shes allowed to continue as it works as disinformation to make people discount rhe issue. 

      Like going from Brigitte being a pedo, and possibly trans, to ranting about a luciferian incest death cult. She ends up hurting the actual truth that shes a grooming monster by throwing too much at the wall. 

      The way she makes connections is highly manic. She connects whatever shes on about. Like acting like israel and france are both in cahoots to kill her when israel currently hates france. If she had a bad meal at McDonald’s shed connect mcdonalds Corp to the aassasination. Same with how she keeps embrlishing her and kirks relationship the more she talks about it, where she acts like he saved her life. And because shes a catholic, she tries to insert that too. Her mania is on high display with how she married a guy just meeting him. 

      Tucker I think is largely authentic and right about a ton things. But he has his own major contradictions. One day he will be advocating for working class, next day calls them lovers, and is from an elite cia family. He also acts broke like saying he wishes he could afford a $2k rifle or saying he was finally free when he paid off his mortgage when he got fired from fox. Dude was worth $100s millions at that point, if he had a mortgage it was entirely out of beneficial financial reasons. Hes definitely playing a „gee shucks“ normal guy character that really doesnt exist. 

      Fuentes is largely authentic. I dont think anyone controls him. He has amazing nationalist ideas. However, he ties them to past bad comments like supremacy, racism, etc, that makes it where the average person discounts his good ideas. Hes getting more palpable though with age and tempering a lot of what he says.

      With candace and nick I dont think any of them are on the take. But theyre allowed to continue and are boosted up to make good ideas sound crazy when combined with their other comments. This has always been an intelligence playbook. Tell some truth, but surrounded by nonsense that deligitimizes the truth to the average person. 

      Alex jones was the first example of this phenomenon. Hes right about AZT, but the way he messaged it made it a meme joke about gay frogs. With how he was destroyed for candy hook I dont think hes fully controlled, but he did flip his values and now shills for the establishment. 

      Meghan is just going to whatever the wind blows her to. Shes an opportunist journalist. From fox, to NBC, to despising trump, to loving him. Its purely financial for her imo. 

      Even though I most agree with someone like Tucker, I believe ana and cenk(who i find mental 70% of the time) are the most authentic. They have their independence and have always been populist. They only drifted right because the dems lost their marbles with the culture wars. I thought id never like ana, but now I agree with a lot of what she says. Same with cenk on certain issues. 

      So I dont think any of them are truly controlled. Theyre just extremely falliable mouth pieces. Thats the whole point. Good ideas from bad messengers mixed with crazy stuff causes good ideas to be discredited. And at the end of the day they are all mostly greedy and looking to expand and corner their markets. Like Tucker shifted his views to corner the market, same with the young turks shifting to go to where most Americans are at. 

      Tucker and the young turks are the most based in reality. I do believe they believe much of what they say. While I think nick does too, hes clearly gay and in conflict with himself on certain topics. I think Candace is very smart but mentally ill. I think Kelly is a cold opportunist following wherever the culture war winds take her. And Alex is an original awesome conspiracy guy but went so mental that hes actually a detriment to truth he may speak. 

      I listen to them all and others though because its about gauging whats right to you, not just believing what youre told from one source. Like people hate piers Morgan and hes wrong about a lot, but atleast he brings on all the voices and you can hear the arguments and determine what resonates most with you. But at the end of the day most of all of this is either distraction or making people feel like theyre changing things by listening to talking heads over actually taking action to make the america they want to see. 

    17. Pure-Anything-585 on

      Remember when everyone knew that pro wrestling was fake & they finally admitted it & the fans didn’t care & continued to watch it anyway?

      We’re almost there with politics & the media…..

    Leave A Reply