Wenn es sich um KI handelt, dann ist die Zeit bis zur Entstehung 20 Jahre zurückgelegt.

    Forensische Teams behaupten, dass dieses Foto jeden einzelnen Authentizitätstest besteht, den die KI nicht besteht:

    1. Die Hände: KI hat Probleme mit der Fingerstruktur; diese sind anatomisch perfekt, auch die Gewichtsverteilung auf der Stuhllehne.
    2. Das Bücherregal: Jede Wirbelsäule hat eine einzigartige Breite und Textur. KI erzeugt fast immer Wiederholungen "verschmieren" Muster auf Hintergrundbüchern.
    3. Der Zeitstempel: Der "23. Oktober 04" Die orangefarbene Überlagerung weist die korrekten Komprimierungsartefakte für eine kompakte Digitalkamera aus den 2000er-Jahren auf. Es ist in das Bildrauschen eingebettet und nicht darüber geschichtet.
    4. Beleuchtung und Schatten: Die warme Deckenbeleuchtung ist bei beiden Motiven gleichmäßig und die Ledersesselreflexionen wirken gleichmäßig. Es gibt keine "nicht übereinstimmend" Schattenwinkel.

    Groß, wenn wahr 😛

    Von DumbMoneyMedia

    Share.

    47 Kommentare

    1. Biggest problem with Trump Epstein stuff is if it was around why didn’t they use it against him in ’16, ’20, ’24?

    2. HasturSleeps on

      Can’t rely on these A.I detector sites. They said the declaration of Independence and the Magna Carter was A.I generated

    3. It’s absolute nonsense. Just take the two fucking seconds to look up pictures of Trump or Clinton from 2004 and note their bodies and their hair. Why the need to incessantly push this stupid fucking story? Trump’s doing plenty enough on his own for us to criticize, but this shit seems straight out of the Steve Bannon playbook. Flood the zone with ridiculous gobbledygook and then use it as a reason to delegitimize your critics.

    4. this is so stupid. its clearly a gemini 3 (nano banana pro) image. look at this one – it even generated the same font for the date. [Gemini 3 Picutre](https://imgur.com/a/uSGbq1B)

      edit: guys please don‘t use ai detectors they never worked for text and they don‘t work on pictures (at least not these shitty online „detectors“. go roll some dice instead). 

    5. Pogopoggers69 on

      I want it to be real but these websites can’t be trusted (and „forensics“ is meaningless here, those websites are nowhere near legal evidence lol) and the carpet looks like standard AI vomit

      I’m deboonking this

    6. leosmi_ajutar on

      Google Gemini detects it as AI due to presence of SynthID watermarks, which is embedded by Google AI tools.

      Yet again AI detectors are shown to be unreliable.

    7. UnmakingTheBan2022 on

      This is so obviously photoshopped. The liberals will literally do ANYTHING.

    8. grapeflavoredboi on

      There should definitely be media literacy tests to get into this sub lol

    9. Wtfjushappen on

      This is such a serious reminder how fucking stupid people are, it never happened.

    10. armyofonetaco on

      No one can trust AI detection tools. Its snake oil that preys on people who are not aware of how AI works. 

    11. LegitimateWorth77 on

      You know I do wonder if it’s a coincidence that we’ve seen an explosion of a technology that forces us to question all photo and video evidence all within the last five years.

    12. If this were real….. why are they both in suits?

      Also, seeing the time stamp, this seems to have been taken with a regular camera… why would the former POTUS allow himself to be photographed getting a blowjob from another man given the Monica Lewinsky scandal was not even a decade old when this was allegedly taken. You’d think he’d exercise more caution…. and that’s not even saying anything about Trump.

      Why would DJT allow someone to take his picture GIVING head to Clinton when everything we know about this man is that he cares DEEPLY about his image and his brand. Photos like this would instantly and irrevocably damage his image and brand.

      Despite both of these compelling reasons, both seem to not mind being photographed quite overtly? I mean, it seems the camera is in the room with them AND it has its flash on. It doesn’t make sense.

    13. Admirable-Guest-2560 on

      Sir, you don’t believe in conspiracies at all, your entire personality is posting trash like this. You *know* it’s fake, we *know* it’s fake. Why are you doing this? Is someone paying you to do this? 

    14. This sub has turned into the fakest trash bullshit liberal wet dream on the entirety of Reddit. May as well rename it.

    15. No_Palpitation5635 on

      Also does huma created mean it’s a picture that was taken or a like photoshopped ?

    16. NekooShogun on

      Those AI detection websites are incredibly unreliable, I once tried to test it with my own song lyrics and 2 out of 5 were labled as AI.

    17. Due_Conversation1436 on

      Even if it was true when did democrats suddenly become anti gay

    18. rickybobysf on

      Everyone acts like AI is a truth on everything. Are people already forgetting about Photoshop?

    19. avenomusduck on

      It’s on the world wide interwebs so it has to be true…./s
      I’m no fan of either wing of the political bird…but all it does is shit on me.

      People need to learn they are being deceived by the engineered social/political and race separation from higher above.
      Think for just 5 minutes…10 …or an hour if you need to….

    20. .. I dunno man, this is a lot of work to basically say „they’re gay everyone, lul“

      Grow the fuck up

    21. Wouldn’t trump be a giant in that picture. It looks realistic but the sizes are off. Also where is bubba’s massive hog?

    22. Shleemy_Pants on

      Op Says „Analyzed with Forensics“……….Shows AI tools found on Google.

    23. Who cares if it’s real? Not illegal to suck bill Clinton’s weiner, funny though

    Leave A Reply