
Grafik von mir, erstellt in Excel. Quelldatensatz hier: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-total-metro-and-micro-statistical-areas.html
Ich dachte, es wäre interessant, die Bevölkerung der Metropolregionen von US-Städten zu vergleichen und zu versuchen, sie zu gruppieren "Ebenen" (groß, mittel, klein usw.). Die Leute reden oft davon, in einem zu leben "klein" oder "groß" Stadt.
Für jede Bevölkerungsstufe habe ich einfach den Bevölkerungsschwellenwert durch 2 geteilt, beginnend mit 12 Millionen.
Von TA-MajestyPalm
19 Kommentare
Graphic by me, created in excel. Source dataset here: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-total-metro-and-micro-statistical-areas.html
I thought it would be interesting to compare metro area populations of US cities, and try and group them into „Tiers“ (large, medium, small etc). People often talk about living in a „small“ or „large“ city.
For each population tier I simply divided the population threshold by 2, starting from 12 million. Obviously the cutoff points are subjective. The bars are scaled to population.
I think it’s funny that Providence, RI has over 500k more people than the state of Rhode Island. The ‚metro area‘ calulation might be a little over tuned lol
Riverside, CA…. wow… the Inland Empire population growth is massive
lmao so we’re just redefining „small“ and „medium“ cities now? Small is generally anything over 5-10k (depending on source) and over 100k is usually medium
Maybe using „metros“ instead of cities would work better.
Interesting. My city has about 160k and I always said I live in a small city.
Apparently the metro area is about 450k and still doesn’t make the list.
These arent cities, this is by metro area.
Orlando, Lakeland, and Tampa all showing up here is fascinating. Increasingly this is just a single huge urban area stretching from coast-to-coast in central
Florida.
Atlanta being considered bigger than SF requires some interesting definitions
Dallas is a city, the metro area is Dallas Fort Worth or DFW.
I’d love to see it by Population Density as well
It continues to blow my mind that anyone uses MSAs for anything other than mocking the federal government’s statisticians.
Virginia Beach is about 450k. The Hampton Roads metro area has the 1.8 million that is mentioned.
This is a much better metric for the ‚city‘ feel than raw city population. Very cool!
Love this graphic.
I would say that some ‚Large‘ cities like Boston and SF and Seattle, feel more like ‚Very Large‘ cities. Tampa probably feels more like a ‚Medium‘ city as well.
A lot of people are pointing out the weirdness of things like SF and San Jose being separate metro areas (or LA and Riverside), but the Census does have Combined Statistical Areas (CSAs) for those ‚larger‘ definitions. The issue with using CSAs instead is they are *extremely* broad in some cases and would just piss people off even more – things like NYC including Trenton, Boston including Providence, Portland including Salem, etc. There is no happy medium unfortunately, at least one thats officially defined and measured.
Claiming LA is a higher tier city than Chicago is fighting words. The LA metro area is ~3x bigger than Chicago’s metro area with only 25% more people.
Greenville metro area is surprising. I had no idea it was that big.
I thought that „tier“ thing for cities was mostly a Chinese thing.
Every city here has more people than some whole states.
NYC is 9M not 20M. You’d have to include NYC, Long Island, and sections of NJ and CT.