Bell: Poilievre bezeichnet den Pipeline-Deal zwischen Smith und Carney als „PR-Stunt“
https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/bell-pierre-poilievre-slams-danielle-smith-mark-carney-pipeline-deal-public-relations-stunt
Bell: Poilievre bezeichnet den Pipeline-Deal zwischen Smith und Carney als „PR-Stunt“
https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/columnists/bell-pierre-poilievre-slams-danielle-smith-mark-carney-pipeline-deal-public-relations-stunt
6 Kommentare
PP talking about public relations stunts is deeply deeply ironic.
Also I’ve shared this before but when you read the Conservative Party of Canada platform in this area it reads almost make believe/parody in how biased it is. I sometimes am shocked this is 2025 and how one of the national major parties operates..
Below is it literally copy and pasted:
**Repeal the Liberal growth-blocking laws**
* **Bill C-69**, which made it nearly impossible to build pipelines and mines.
* **Bill C-48**, which banned oil tankers on Canada’s west coast.
* The **industrial carbon tax,** which raises costs on everything for all Canadians.
* The **oil and gas cap** that kills jobs.
* The **EV sales mandate** that will increase the price of a gas-powered car by $20,000.
* The **Plastics Ban** that blocks growth.
* The **Liberal censorship law targeting energy companies**, which gags producers from defending their work and promoting Canadian energy.
Notice every single thing is Oil & Gas Lobby centered… Everything…
Pay attention to that last one in particular as I keep pointing out as much as I am able to everywhere. That is a bill that makes it illegal for the Oil & Gas Lobby to greenwash and in particular misinform/misrepresent (lie) to the Canadian populace about realities. It carries with it a financial penalty. Notice how that is rephrased as „which gags producers from defending their work and promoting Canadian energy.“
The Conservative Parties of Canada at provincial and federal level are not at all interested in any multidimensionality of policy/perspectives for the future. They are arms of the Oil & Gas Lobby.
That’s it. Period.
I find the idea of another pipeline appalling, but politically Poilievre and the Tories have effectively been outflanked in the Reform heartland.
“Carney didn’t announce a pipeline!”
(Works with Alberta to get an agreement on a pipeline)
“It’s a stunt!”
PP is just mad Carney is doing things
>“It really is pathetic the prime minister can’t stand in his place and defend his position,” he says.
>The Conservative leader turns up the heat.
>“He’s afraid to defend the fact on Thursday he will not sign on to a new pipeline, he will sign on to a public relations stunt while planning to hide behind the premier of B.C.”
>Then the line drawing cheers from the Conservatives.
>If Carney really wanted a pipeline and if he doesn’t believe in the anti-oilpatch “keep-it-in-the-ground ideology he supported for ten years” he would stand up and say he backed a pipeline to B.C.’s northwest coast.
>Carney doesn’t stand up despite more prodding from Poilievre.
The script-like nature of Mr Bell’s writing style make this confrontation sound like some sort of stereotypical school bully scene in a film or theatrical production. In all seriousness though, how does Poilievre expect anyone to take him seriously when he’s still dishing out these petty insults? I got the impression from this article that Carney just didn’t have the energy to put up with Poilievre and just simply opted to disengage with him entirely.
There’s not even a company *proposing* a pipeline, I don’t get what PP wants Carney to do.
Unless he’s advocating for nationalization of our resources and creating a national company…
Not here to comment on the pipeline stuff – just here to point out that the writing in this article is atrocious.