Tausende Fans bezeichnen Disney als „kreativ bankrott“, nachdem der Live-Action-Trailer zu Moana fälschlicherweise für „KI-Fälschung“ gehalten wurde.
https://www.nine.com.au/entertainment/latest/fans-brutal-reaction-to-disney-moana-trailer-mistake-for-ai-fake/786eb48c-d269-4032-9a29-e0d4fa959d40
44 Kommentare
Well Tbf Disney hasn’t been giving its best shots lately.
The real problem is AI looks artificial.
Disney has been chasing artificially created content to save money.
Ai has caught up to Disney’s cheapness.
Disney must differentiate itself from Ai.
You think they made a mistake? Lmao. They just easing the transition to actual AI when they can fire literally everyone. Just be the shareholders and a server n the end…
Does it really matter if its AI or looks crappy? Disney Fans will still troop out to see it.
Millions of people who don’t bother to comment on Social Media are going to watch this and it’s going to make a Billion Dollars
This movie is going to make a billion dollars regardless. Same with live action Lilo and Stitch, and Moana 2.
People just slop it right up, and then they ignore the new/original IP. Why would Disney stop following a working strategy?
There was no point in making a liveaction moana in the first place. Instead they could have used those finances to fund some amazing new stories.
A live-action remake of something that isn’t 10 years old yet before a live-action remake of Hercules too? 🙂↔️
It would be great if they came up with new ideas
Uh oh, The Rock isn’t going to like this
Yeah, I think people are maybe getting sick of 100% greenscreen „live action“ films.
I saw a screenshot and i totally thought it was fan made ai, oh no
maybe this will get them to retool like the Sonic trailer bombed. It looks so artificial…
The Moana-ified Disney logo at the beginning of the trailer definitely looks AI generated
Going forward, they could just release the animated and live versions at the same time.
Less AI and more focus on real locations, building beautiful sets that blend practical effects with CGI. Make the audience feel they’re seeing something wonderful.
All these remakes suck
It’s way too soon for a Moana remake-that’s why I would have assumed it’s fake
It’s okay, as long as humans continue paying to visit the Billboard Parks, they’ll be fine.
Why call it live action if like you’re gonna use CG dwarves? Same with this, it looks so heavily CGed that it doesn’t even feel live action
It’s not that it looks AI it just looks bad visually and audiences know it looks bad but can’t describe why so AI is the default response. It has the usually bland hollywood production quality of shooting as flatly as possible and edit it all in post.
I’ve never understood the point of these live action remakes, they almost feel like they’re completely against the brand. For years and years Disney’s hallmark was truly fantastic animation and the creative worlds that can be created by hand, putting it in live action is the opposite of that IMO. They can’t be particularly cheap to make either
I knew we were heading to this.
Is it just me or does this girl have straightened hair?
Finally we can see a modern take on Moana!
The main problem is that anybody sees anything nowadays and it’s automatically AI to them. Like look at the comment section on some of the things that pop up on Reddit somewhere in almost every post someone’s like this isn’t true it’s AI. With no factual evidence to back it up other than the fact that they just think everything is AI. So you’re going to have both sides to this some people are going to think nothing is AI and then there’s going to be some people that think everything is AI and there’s going to be hardly anyone in between.
It would be so much better if they just started adapting these movies like the stage adaptation of Lion King, and film that.
They ARE creatively bankrupt… but not because of AI
Using this much CGI in the service of making a “live action” movie that looks exactly like the animated one—why would I not just watch the animated one?
Live action remake. 3/4 of trailer CGI.
They are creatively bankrupt. There is absolutely no need to do this film and it’s going to tank
>Despite poor critical reviews, Disney’s 2019 take on The Lion King still stands as the most commercially successful remake, ranking as the 11th highest-grossing film of all time.
They will never stop making them.
Doesn’t the fact that they’re taking a cartoon and remaking it instead of trying to find new story’s scream “creatively bankrupt”?
Who cares how much AI they use at this point.
I already know how it ends. I can already say the cartoon was better.
Disney has completely given up.
“Enchanted”
The last live action Disney original idea…
So sick of how lazy Disney Executives have become since then
Disney/M-She-U/Lucas Film its all green screen, whats the difference?
The philosophical and practical issues (and they are big issues) of the nature of AI and its use in mass produced media aside, here are my completely unsolicited thoughts on the very common “creatively bankrupt” complaints.
The point in making the live action Moana is money. It’s the far safer financial bet than solely investing in amazing new stories. I assure you they’ve done the market research to the Nth degree and they know that franchises (sequels) and remakes will drive more people out of their living rooms to the theater than originals these days than any other content and that is just a fact sad as you may find it to be. Established IPs are also way cheaper to market because people already know what they are based on the name alone. Doesn’t matter what Frozen 3 is about it’s called Frozen 3. Live action Moana will probably make somewhere between $750mil to just clearing $1B just like Lilo and Stitch just did.
Believe me. I get it. Lots of folks either don’t have interest in, or actively detest, the remakes. But there are a few things further that I wish many people would bear in mind everytime the same sad tired complaints get trotted out every single time there is any remake news:
1. If you simply hate Disney and the way they tell stories/do anything, fine. That’s your prerogative. But jog on. Invest your time in something else you actually like and maybe quit boring the rest of us with the same basic Disney sucks and is unoriginal refrain (which is ironically the most unoriginal take to waste making a comment over). You are more than welcome to say it, but I assure you it’s been duly noted and no one cares.
2. Disney does make original content relatively often but it’s not drawing money the way the unoriginal stuff does. No one is leaving their house to go see it.
It’s also primarily why more of the original stuff gets jettisoned to steaming so they don’t lose precious theatrical calendar space to the stuff that does make money. Which leads me to,
3. There is a remake/reboot/unoriginality issue but it’s not just a Disney problem it’s an industry wide problem created by both the impact of streaming on the theatrical model as well as the shorted theatrical exhibition window created by the pandemic as well the rise of on demand digital versions and the fall of the sale of physical medial. Every studio invests more heavily in established IP because people go see it and they buy more merch related to it. The only sure bet for original content that people will leave their houses to see are horror movies which tends to be a more social genre and they tend to be cheaper to make. But comedies? Straight to streaming. Any dramatic, artsy, historical, or otherwise serious film that a studio doesn’t feel has the legs to make a run at the Oscars will have an extremely limited run or go straight to streaming. Even the films the studios artistically or critically believe in will not be all that profitable and they likely will have narrower distribution in the first place.
The good news, at least in my opinion, is that all this doesn’t have to be an either/or proposition. In an ideal world Disney is doing it all as much as they can do because they are a big company with a lot of projects and interests and profit is profit to be used for all of it (original stuff, Animation, Pixar, Star Wars, Marvel, parks, etc.) Go ahead and make the live action movies for the folks that very obviously want to go see it so they can also do other things as much as possible.
So did Disney just take out the „Imagineers“ old yeller style?
This article is an example of increasingly poor journalism, where instead of real news, it put all the focus on user opinions that they know for a fact is wrong. Complaints of AI have often most commonly shallow and outright incorrect, with people mistaking cheap CGI for AI, or studio lighting for AI, or old low quality images for AI.
They should stop with the live actions!! Lilo and stitch was not a good live action and also who is asking for the live actions!
Slammy slam SLAM!
I am whatever about live action remakes, but bad CGI has been around for a long time.. people just like calling it AI fake to make it sound worse than it already is lol.
What’s the opposite of a renaissance? That’s where Disney is right now. They’ve so obviously been putting profits in front of everything, They’re a shell of their greatness. Their current CEO is a clown.
I’m not entirely against a live action Moana, but why did it have to be a remake of the original film? Why not use the characters and setting for a new story instead?
I don’t see an issue with the trailer.