Share.

    33 Kommentare

    1. ClearlyNotMeAtAll on

      >*The group claim the dye used is environmentally harmless, with the action meant to signify „the massive effects of climate collapse“.*

      I am sure that the fishes were happy to know that it was „harmless“.

    2. It’s weird how obsessed the world is with Greta. As if she’s the only environmentalist out there doing stuff like this… move along.

    3. AxlIsAShoto on

      Banning her is like giving her a gold medal tbh. Having said that, I guess the city needed to do „something“ even if they 100% agree with her?

      If at least 10% of us had half the courage she has the world would be a way better place IMHO.

    4. This woman will attach her name to anything trending. She is 100% an Attention seeker. Yawn…

    5. Meanwhile they lock down Venice for Bezos for which 90 private planes arrived. But yeah, the guys who want to protect our planet are the bad guys.

    6. Any-Original-6113 on

      Despite her follies, Greta is increasingly becoming a symbol of the struggle for a balance between human activity and elimination of consequences.
      The actions attract attention and people start asking uncomfortable questions to officials.
      Only by getting out of your comfort zone can you force yourself to move forward.

    7. eucariota92 on

      Environmentalists doing something stupid to draw negative attention again. They are worse than little kids seeking attention from papa.

    8. Sooo, we demonstrate against pollution and dye a canal in one sentence? And don’t start with „bio degradable color“.

    9. Mind you, this is the same city that had to spend hundreds of million of dollars building a wall to protect itself from being flooded due to the rising sea water brought by climate change. 

      But a dyed canal is obviously much worse /s

    10. Expensive-Alarm-8808 on

      Sorry, this is just vandalism now. I think she has been pushing a bit much. I agree with her strong feelings on many of these issues, but come on, chill out a bit.

      Start using verbal and other intelligence instead of teenage angst.

    11. I mean, it’s only a 48 hour ban. But I’m a little sceptical about how colouring the water green doesn’t have any ecological effect on plant life or fish.

      Yes I’m aware that we’re harming the world far worse with fossil fuels. I’m just curious about the claim put out that putting some kind of colouring material into the river has no impact on the environment. Though I will stand gladly corrected.

    12. Happinessisawarmbunn on

      It’s amazing no one mentions greta’s family and the money she comes from!!

    13. gymleader_michael on

      The bots are out. Vandalism is today’s buzzword.

      Some people add pond dye to water due to the benefits it can have. Industrial plants dump wastewater regularly that have more impact than this stunt. Only difference is that it’s not as easy to see (kind of the whole point of the stunt, I’d imagine).

    14. AutisticPizzaBoy on

      I still can’t understand why she used dye and not soap.

      Smh my head.

    15. doomedratboy on

      Man i support the message, but i feel like this way of protest is literally helping the other side.

    16. TheFuture2001 on

      I am confused – polluting the water is a good way to convince people not to pollute?

    17. bitterbettyagain on

      She should do stuff like this in Saudi Arabia. Would love to see it

    18. Careful_Bell8426 on

      You get harsher punishment for swimming in the canals. Absolute joke of a place, shittiest pizza in Italy too.

    19. Acting like the grand canal in Venice isn’t polluted to shit with or without the dye

    Leave A Reply