Share.

    17 Kommentare

    1. I wonder how long before we can see actions begin against those mentioned in those records or is this stuff just going to end up as another political point.

    2. MJcorrieviewer on

      „the Court should authorize the Department of Justice to release the grand jury transcripts and lift any preexisting protective orders that would otherwise prevent public disclosure,“

      Who put on the preexisting protective orders that prevented public disclosure in the first place? I don’t get why this has to go to court at all.

    3. Bondi is really starting to look her age. Playing legal goalie for Team Trump is taking its toll.

    4. >The motion, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Attorney General Pam Bondi

      Florida? A shit state

    5. She trying to blame it on the judges again. She can release the evidence she has without releasing grand jury testimony.

      I have a hard time believing she’s not compromised at this point. Why else keep up the charade? Anyone else would have resigned by now.

    6. Considering the fact that the democrats are essentially neutered. I don’t hold on to much hope this will result in anything favorable.

      Every day we beg for a watchdog, and every day- we get that little asshole that barks at everything so long as the gate is shut.

    7. jediporcupine on

      We really trying this distraction again?

      Just release everything you have, Pam. The DOJ is sitting on a treasure trove of their own investigative material.

    8. AllPraiseJJireh on

      Judge already told us grand jury is old and nothing revelatory.. just a smoke screen.. she is trying to muddy the waters

    9. “Hey mom can we have the Epstein files?”

      “We have grand jury records at home.”

    10. Funny bit about the article in context of all the other comments:

      >President Trump, who at one time had a friendship with Epstein and had been against the bill, dropped his opposition and [signed](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-says-signed-epstein-files-bill/) it into law on Wednesday. Mr. Trump, who cut ties with Epstein years ago, has not been accused of wrongdoing.

      There is a lot to unpack there. Especially if you think this is a slam dunk one way or the other.

    11. Spam-and-rice on

      Let’s face it – it’s all scrubbed. We have to rely and hope for a whistle blower who has all the un redacted files at this point.

    Leave A Reply