Any judge will instruct any jury to assume the worst case scenario for the evidence. Assume it is the brick thrown through the window of the house that broke the camel’s back, with a signed confession taped to the brick.
That’s just stupid. Also, fuck ICE, GOP, and Trump especially.
LowellWeicker2025 on
Funny how that works.
kanga0359 on
Trump’s AmeriKKKa.
lordagr on
The same thing the DoJ is about to say about the Epstein Files.
typewriter6986 on
What? Did Noem shoot the computer?
Small_Dog_8699 on
So we are adding “destruction of evidence” to the charges?
SamuelJacksonThird on
Well isn’t that amazingly convenient for them!
Pleasant_Expert_1990 on
Wow the system crashed and the results look like the standard DoD seven pass wipe on a hard drive but it was really a random event ….
DominusFL on
Funny thing is that those who work with computers know that computers crashing do not delete videos.
smurfalidocious on
If the government can’t provide the evidence that should be an immediate ruling against the government.
Sasquatters on
Like the time Citadel Securities was being looked into and then the warehouse where they stored a ton of documents caught fire while all of the fire prevention systems failed simultaneously.
TakuyaLee on
Right….“system crash“…..
AugmentedKing on
“My dog ate my homework”
RAdm_Teabag on
that’s cool. They are required by law to retain these records, so just bring the I.T. managers up on charges and see how quickly the story changes.
G3Saint on
„Things Happen“
dztruthseek on
I’m sure ICE claims a lot of things.
trelium06 on
My dog ate my homework excuse for adults
Kannibelanimal1966 on
What a criminal Administration
CDavis10717 on
“Hmmmmmm…” —DOJ re Epstein files.
_Dammitman_ on
I would be willing to bet that system crashes a lot! Matter of fact it stays crashed more than it operates.
psycho_candy0 on
Thats okay. Failure to maintain ESI (electronically stored information) just means that a judge may instruct a jury to assume the destroyed evidence would have been unfavorable to the party that failed to preserve it. I mean if nothing else, the failure of the administration to effectively preserve evidence is grounds for sanctions.
ledow on
Ask the IT guy to testify to that and see what he says.
Because I bet they’ll have a different answer.
mvw2 on
This doesn’t exonerate them. It just means they have „less“ proof they could use to show they didn’t abuse.
Now I get it. Destroy evidence so it can’t be used against you. But they are also defending meaning it’s their burden to prove innocence. The outcome with it without the evidence should be the same. There just won’t be actual footage of the abuse.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
25 Kommentare
Riiiiiiiiight.
Remember that your grandparents figured out how to deal with them once before:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nazis_executed_by_the_United_States_military
Any judge will instruct any jury to assume the worst case scenario for the evidence. Assume it is the brick thrown through the window of the house that broke the camel’s back, with a signed confession taped to the brick.
That’s just stupid. Also, fuck ICE, GOP, and Trump especially.
Funny how that works.
Trump’s AmeriKKKa.
The same thing the DoJ is about to say about the Epstein Files.
What? Did Noem shoot the computer?
So we are adding “destruction of evidence” to the charges?
Well isn’t that amazingly convenient for them!
Wow the system crashed and the results look like the standard DoD seven pass wipe on a hard drive but it was really a random event ….
Funny thing is that those who work with computers know that computers crashing do not delete videos.
If the government can’t provide the evidence that should be an immediate ruling against the government.
Like the time Citadel Securities was being looked into and then the warehouse where they stored a ton of documents caught fire while all of the fire prevention systems failed simultaneously.
Right….“system crash“…..
“My dog ate my homework”
that’s cool. They are required by law to retain these records, so just bring the I.T. managers up on charges and see how quickly the story changes.
„Things Happen“
I’m sure ICE claims a lot of things.
My dog ate my homework excuse for adults
What a criminal Administration
“Hmmmmmm…” —DOJ re Epstein files.
I would be willing to bet that system crashes a lot! Matter of fact it stays crashed more than it operates.
Thats okay. Failure to maintain ESI (electronically stored information) just means that a judge may instruct a jury to assume the destroyed evidence would have been unfavorable to the party that failed to preserve it. I mean if nothing else, the failure of the administration to effectively preserve evidence is grounds for sanctions.
Ask the IT guy to testify to that and see what he says.
Because I bet they’ll have a different answer.
This doesn’t exonerate them. It just means they have „less“ proof they could use to show they didn’t abuse.
Now I get it. Destroy evidence so it can’t be used against you. But they are also defending meaning it’s their burden to prove innocence. The outcome with it without the evidence should be the same. There just won’t be actual footage of the abuse.