In dem ziemlich kitschigen Video, das Trumps Empörung hervorrief, waren die Senatoren Mark Kelly und Elissa Slotkin sowie die Abgeordneten Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander und Chrissy Houlahan zu sehen – allesamt ehemalige Militär- oder Geheimdienstveteranen.
„Diese Regierung stellt unsere uniformierten Militär- und Geheimdienstmitarbeiter gegen amerikanische Bürger. Wie wir haben Sie alle einen Eid geschworen, diese Verfassung zu schützen und zu verteidigen. Derzeit kommen die Bedrohungen unserer Verfassung nicht nur aus dem Ausland, sondern direkt von hier zu Hause“, sagten die Demokraten. „Unsere Gesetze sind klar. Sie können illegale Befehle ablehnen.“
Earlier this year
https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5162069-pentagon-officers-fired/
Von One-Incident3208
7 Kommentare
Calling for the execution of people who tell the military to follow the law and defend the constitution is not the flex that Trump thinks it is.
I don’t know how it is now, but when I joined you swore an oath to defend the constitution.
What is the penalty for treason?
what those death threats are
as far is i understand
they are threatening or inciting violence
while
we have allready learnt how trump prefers to „unalive“ to use his words people who travel on boats in international waters instead of following the usual procedure to stop them, take their drugs away from them and bring them before court where they might get a mild sentence if they were for example doing such smuggling tours for the first time
80 people travelling on board of such ships what might have or have not transported drugs became victim of the supreme murderer in chief of usa intimidation urges what of course also make everyone in the military passing down those premeditated murder orders and enacting on them complicit
those people in boats were not doing any agression, they were not attacking anyone
because transporting drugs is not an agression itself
its the buyer who is responsible to buy or not something of unknown quality in a shady street corner what might have the consequence of dying from the consumption of such substances
also worth noting how there was someone with the united nations who recently called those murders out as „extrajudical killings“ and unacceptable behaviour in international waters
and even after that
the „unaliving“ of people on boats continued
————–
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/01/23/464129029/donald-trump-i-could-shoot-somebody-and-i-wouldnt-lose-any-voters
Donald Trump: ‚I Could … Shoot Somebody, And I Wouldn’t Lose Any Voters‘
January 23, 2016
You know this piece of work has no clue of how our country is structured much less its laws!! Now he is talking Hitler manure!!
Behind their standard chronic lying, buttressed by newspeak vocabulary, they are encouraging the military to violate immigration law and the constitution. The same laws and constitution they allowed to be trodden on by the Biden administration. The latter should disqualify them from anyone taking them seriously. Supporting an insurrection is treason with corresponding penalties. J6 was a protest against an election that was clearly stolen (81m votes?) and a setup to ensnare the protesters for executing their Constitutional rights. Up is down; in is out, black is white.
How is this not impeachable?
Any conservative or MAGA person care to explain it to me?