[SS from the essay by Maria Repnikova, Endowed Chair in Strategic Communication at Georgia State University and the author of the forthcoming book „Competing for Soft Power: China’s Image-Making in Africa“]
Since the start of his second term, U.S. President Donald Trump has been dismantling the traditional channels of American soft power. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is no longer operational, and Voice of America is tied up in legislative and court battles. The State Department has significantly reduced its staff and programming. Restrictive new visa and immigration policies have made the United States less accessible and less attractive to potential visitors, and Washington’s coercive and transactional dealings with U.S. allies have damaged trust abroad. In *The New York Times*, Jamie Shea, a former NATO official, referred to these sweeping changes as the United States’ “soft power suicide.”
Many experts and commentators have interpreted the United States’ loss as China’s gain. The late political scientist Joseph Nye, who developed the concept of soft power, cautioned earlier this year that China “stands ready to fill the vacuum that Trump is creating.” Yanzhong Huang, a scholar at the Council on Foreign Relations, similarly contended that the Trump administration’s actions have “boosted China’s charm offensive.”
How is this the only mention of Europe in an article about a geopolitical soft power vacuum? I thought the EU was supposed to be a soft superpower. Can someone make the case that the EU is stepping up?
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
2 Kommentare
[SS from the essay by Maria Repnikova, Endowed Chair in Strategic Communication at Georgia State University and the author of the forthcoming book „Competing for Soft Power: China’s Image-Making in Africa“]
Since the start of his second term, U.S. President Donald Trump has been dismantling the traditional channels of American soft power. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is no longer operational, and Voice of America is tied up in legislative and court battles. The State Department has significantly reduced its staff and programming. Restrictive new visa and immigration policies have made the United States less accessible and less attractive to potential visitors, and Washington’s coercive and transactional dealings with U.S. allies have damaged trust abroad. In *The New York Times*, Jamie Shea, a former NATO official, referred to these sweeping changes as the United States’ “soft power suicide.”
Many experts and commentators have interpreted the United States’ loss as China’s gain. The late political scientist Joseph Nye, who developed the concept of soft power, cautioned earlier this year that China “stands ready to fill the vacuum that Trump is creating.” Yanzhong Huang, a scholar at the Council on Foreign Relations, similarly contended that the Trump administration’s actions have “boosted China’s charm offensive.”
>China’s reputation is overwhelmingly negative in the Asia-Pacific and in [Europe](https://www.foreignaffairs.com/regions/europe).
How is this the only mention of Europe in an article about a geopolitical soft power vacuum? I thought the EU was supposed to be a soft superpower. Can someone make the case that the EU is stepping up?